Comparison Overview

Glover Stanbury

VS

KPMG

Glover Stanbury

30 Bear Street, Barnstaple, EX32 7DD, GB
Last Update:

Chartered Accountants and Registered Auditors....... We are Chartered Accountants based in North Devon with a tag line of "Experience the Difference!"​. Like the proverbial pudding, the proof is in the eating and you can sample a taster by taking advantage of a free meeting at which you will gain an insight into why our services are so very highly regarded by clients. Advice, training and support on the efficient use of IT is something of a passion but we also focus on minimising tax, business and personal strategic planning, profit improvement and creative wealth management as well as all the usual accounting stuff. It would be great to hear from you.

NAICS: 5412
NAICS Definition: Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KPMG

Worldwide, CA
Last Update: 2026-03-28
Between 800 and 849

KPMG is a global organization of independent professional services firms providing Audit, Tax and Advisory services. KPMG is the brand under which the member firms of KPMG International Limited (“KPMG International”) operate and provide professional services. “KPMG” is used to refer to individual member firms within the KPMG organization or to one or more member firms collectively. KPMG firms operate in 143 countries and territories with more than 273,000 partners and employees working in member firms around the world. Each KPMG firm is a legally distinct and separate entity and describes itself as such. Each KPMG member firm is responsible for its own obligations and liabilities. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee. KPMG International Limited and its related entities do not provide services to clients. For more detail about our structure, please visit kpmg.com/governance.

NAICS: 5412
NAICS Definition: Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees: 238,915
Subsidiaries: 71
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glover-stanbury-&-co.jpeg
Glover Stanbury
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpmg.jpeg
KPMG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Glover Stanbury
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KPMG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glover Stanbury in 2026.

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPMG in 2026.

Incident History — Glover Stanbury (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glover Stanbury cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KPMG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPMG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glover-stanbury-&-co.jpeg
Glover Stanbury
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpmg.jpeg
KPMG
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain (ransom)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

KPMG company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Glover Stanbury company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

KPMG company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Glover Stanbury company has not reported any.

In the current year, KPMG company has reported more cyber incidents than Glover Stanbury company.

KPMG company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Glover Stanbury company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither KPMG company nor Glover Stanbury company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KPMG company nor Glover Stanbury company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Glover Stanbury company nor KPMG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Glover Stanbury nor KPMG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

KPMG company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Glover Stanbury company.

KPMG company employs more people globally than Glover Stanbury company, reflecting its scale as a Accounting.

Neither Glover Stanbury nor KPMG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Glover Stanbury nor KPMG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Glover Stanbury nor KPMG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Glover Stanbury nor KPMG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Glover Stanbury nor KPMG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Glover Stanbury nor KPMG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H