Comparison Overview

Global Mining Review

VS

Technology Publishing Company

Global Mining Review

15 South Street, Farnham, GU9 7QU, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.globalminingreview.com/

Global Mining Review is a leading trade magazine covering the mining and minerals industry. Read by key decision makers across the world, each issue is full of the latest technical insights and news you need to stay up to date. We also offer daily news and analysis on our website and social media. Follow us here on our LinkedIn showcase page, join our LinkedIn Group, or check us out on Twitter and Facebook.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Technology Publishing Company

1501 Reedsdale St, Pittsburgh, 15233, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799
http://www.technologypub.com

Technology Publishing Company (TPC) is a business-to-business media company covering the protective, marine and industrial coatings industries. TPC offers a variety of market data and insight tools and the curation of custom media. Our mission is to advance the science and technology in these fields by disseminating information about best practices in the selection and use of coatings and related construction materials. Two cornerstones of the company’s operations are (1) to serve readers across the entire value chain within a business segment, such as suppliers, specifiers, facility owners, and contractors; and (2) to create the highest quality content, in part by recruiting top industry thinkers as advisers and contributors. TPC holds a yearly event that has become one of the most prestigious networking events, Contractor Connect. Contractor Connect is a three-day “hosted-buyer” event for the protective and marine coatings industry that brings together qualified buyers (contractors) and sellers (suppliers). This event is invitation only; however, inquiries are welcomed. Over the course of the event, major industrial coating contractors and suppliers will have substantial opportunities to further develop personal and professional relationships. These enhanced contacts will lead to new business and the growth of existing customer accounts. Additional information can be found on our website.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/globalmining.jpeg
Global Mining Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technology-publishing-company.jpeg
Technology Publishing Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Global Mining Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Technology Publishing Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Global Mining Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technology Publishing Company in 2025.

Incident History — Global Mining Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Global Mining Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Technology Publishing Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technology Publishing Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/globalmining.jpeg
Global Mining Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technology-publishing-company.jpeg
Technology Publishing Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Global Mining Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Technology Publishing Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Technology Publishing Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Global Mining Review company.

In the current year, Technology Publishing Company company and Global Mining Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Technology Publishing Company company nor Global Mining Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Technology Publishing Company company nor Global Mining Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Technology Publishing Company company nor Global Mining Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Global Mining Review company nor Technology Publishing Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Global Mining Review nor Technology Publishing Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Global Mining Review company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Technology Publishing Company company.

Neither Global Mining Review nor Technology Publishing Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Global Mining Review nor Technology Publishing Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Global Mining Review nor Technology Publishing Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Global Mining Review nor Technology Publishing Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Global Mining Review nor Technology Publishing Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Global Mining Review nor Technology Publishing Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References