Comparison Overview

Global Mining Review

VS

Ask.com

Global Mining Review

15 South Street, Farnham, GU9 7QU, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.globalminingreview.com/

Global Mining Review is a leading trade magazine covering the mining and minerals industry. Read by key decision makers across the world, each issue is full of the latest technical insights and news you need to stay up to date. We also offer daily news and analysis on our website and social media. Follow us here on our LinkedIn showcase page, join our LinkedIn Group, or check us out on Twitter and Facebook.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ask.com

555 12th Street, Oakland, 94607, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.askmediagroup.com/

Ask.com is now part of the Ask Media Group (under IAC Publishing within the IAC/InterActive family). Please visit http://www.askmediagroup.com/ for more information about Ask.com and our collection of websites under the new Ask Media Group brand. About Ask.com Founded as Ask Jeeves in 1996 and re-named Ask.com in 2005, Ask.com had spent the last 20 years committed to its mission of increasing personal knowledge by empowering people with answers. Routed in the East Bay of the San Francisco Bay Area, Ask calls Oakland it's home!

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 246
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/globalmining.jpeg
Global Mining Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ask-com.jpeg
Ask.com
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Global Mining Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ask.com
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Global Mining Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ask.com in 2025.

Incident History — Global Mining Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Global Mining Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ask.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ask.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/globalmining.jpeg
Global Mining Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ask-com.jpeg
Ask.com
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Global Mining Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ask.com company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ask.com company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Global Mining Review company.

In the current year, Ask.com company and Global Mining Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ask.com company nor Global Mining Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ask.com company nor Global Mining Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ask.com company nor Global Mining Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Global Mining Review company nor Ask.com company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Global Mining Review nor Ask.com holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Global Mining Review company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ask.com company.

Neither Global Mining Review nor Ask.com holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Global Mining Review nor Ask.com holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Global Mining Review nor Ask.com holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Global Mining Review nor Ask.com holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Global Mining Review nor Ask.com holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Global Mining Review nor Ask.com holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References