Comparison Overview

GlobalFoundries

VS

Microchip Technology Inc.

GlobalFoundries

400 Stone Break Road Extension, Malta, 12020, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://gf.com/

GlobalFoundries (GF) is one of the world’s leading semiconductor manufacturers. GF is redefining innovation and semiconductor manufacturing by developing and delivering feature-rich process technology solutions that provide leadership performance in pervasive high growth markets. GF offers a unique mix of design, development, and fabrication services. With a talented and diverse workforce and an at-scale manufacturing footprint spanning the U.S., Europe and Asia, GF is a trusted technology source to its worldwide customers. For more information, visit www.gf.com. GlobalFoundries is an Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action (EEO/AA) employer.

NAICS: 3344
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 13,706
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Microchip Technology Inc.

Chandler, AZ, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 650 and 699
http://www.microchip.com/

Microchip Technology Inc. is a leading semiconductor supplier of smart, connected and secure embedded control solutions. Its easy-to-use development tools and comprehensive product portfolio enable customers to create optimal designs which reduce risk while lowering total system cost and time to market. The company’s solutions serve more than 125,000 customers across the industrial, automotive, consumer, aerospace and defense, communications and computing markets. Headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, Microchip offers outstanding technical support along with dependable delivery and quality. For more information, visit the Microchip website at www.microchip.com. The content on our LinkedIn page may contain AI-generated imagery, performers and/or audio.

NAICS: 3344
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 17,217
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/globalfoundries.jpeg
GlobalFoundries
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microchip-technology.jpeg
Microchip Technology Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GlobalFoundries
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Microchip Technology Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GlobalFoundries in 2026.

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Microchip Technology Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — GlobalFoundries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GlobalFoundries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Microchip Technology Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microchip Technology Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/globalfoundries.jpeg
GlobalFoundries
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microchip-technology.jpeg
Microchip Technology Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution, Email Phishing, Phone Calls
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Email, Telephone
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

GlobalFoundries company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Microchip Technology Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Microchip Technology Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas GlobalFoundries company has not reported any.

In the current year, Microchip Technology Inc. company and GlobalFoundries company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Microchip Technology Inc. company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while GlobalFoundries company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Microchip Technology Inc. company nor GlobalFoundries company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Microchip Technology Inc. company nor GlobalFoundries company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GlobalFoundries company nor Microchip Technology Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GlobalFoundries nor Microchip Technology Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Microchip Technology Inc. company and GlobalFoundries company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Microchip Technology Inc. company employs more people globally than GlobalFoundries company, reflecting its scale as a Semiconductor Manufacturing.

Neither GlobalFoundries nor Microchip Technology Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GlobalFoundries nor Microchip Technology Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GlobalFoundries nor Microchip Technology Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GlobalFoundries nor Microchip Technology Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GlobalFoundries nor Microchip Technology Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GlobalFoundries nor Microchip Technology Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References