Comparison Overview

Global Packaging, Inc.

VS

Dynagraph

Global Packaging, Inc.

209 Brower Avenue, Oaks, PA, 19456, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

•We offer High Definition Printing in up to 10 Colors • Converted Poly Bags tailored to meet your performance Specifications • Extrusion: Monolayer and Co-extruded, and Recycled Content polyethylene films (PCR and PIR) • Lamination & Slitting •Specializing in products for top Consumer Products Companies •Markets include Diapers, Sanitary, Pet Food, Snack Foods, Towel & Tissue, Candy & Baked Goods,& more •Supply Chain Management •Excellent Geographic Locations in Oaks, PA, Hamlet, NC •Continuous Reinvestment in the latest Technology •First Wide Web Flexo Printer to be awarded certification as a Sustainable Green Printer •Our Reputation as a Quality Printer of High End Packaging covers customers’ demands from Private Label to Premium Label AIB Certification GMI Certified

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 131
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dynagraph

Dynagraph Gulf FZ LLC, Dubai, undefined, 35495, AE
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

The future is here. Dynagraph is the leading provider of printing technology in the Middle East Region covering all aspects of print from start to finish. Applications include General Commercial printing, Folding Cartons, Flexible Packaging, Label packaging, Corrugating packaging, Security, Signage&Graphics, 3D Additive Manufacturing. We can supply you with cutting-edge technologies you need to tap into the latest industry trends and help you unleash, and grow your business potential all the while delivering premium quality and unlimited colors without compromise.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 132
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-packaging-inc.jpeg
Global Packaging, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynagraph.jpeg
Dynagraph
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Global Packaging, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dynagraph
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Global Packaging, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dynagraph in 2025.

Incident History — Global Packaging, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Global Packaging, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dynagraph (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dynagraph cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-packaging-inc.jpeg
Global Packaging, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynagraph.jpeg
Dynagraph
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Global Packaging, Inc. company and Dynagraph company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Dynagraph company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Global Packaging, Inc. company.

In the current year, Dynagraph company and Global Packaging, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dynagraph company nor Global Packaging, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dynagraph company nor Global Packaging, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dynagraph company nor Global Packaging, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Global Packaging, Inc. company nor Dynagraph company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Global Packaging, Inc. nor Dynagraph holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Global Packaging, Inc. company nor Dynagraph company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dynagraph company employs more people globally than Global Packaging, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Global Packaging, Inc. nor Dynagraph holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Global Packaging, Inc. nor Dynagraph holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Global Packaging, Inc. nor Dynagraph holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Global Packaging, Inc. nor Dynagraph holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Global Packaging, Inc. nor Dynagraph holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Global Packaging, Inc. nor Dynagraph holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N