Comparison Overview

GES

VS

Process Solutions, Inc.

GES

5215 Hellyer Ave, San Jose, California, 95138, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

GES is among the global leaders in automation, test and measurement. Our technical expertise combined with our high volume/low cost manufacturing in Asia make us a great partner for your engineering challenges. GES has its headquarters in San Jose, California and many satellite operations throughout Asia to support customers worldwide. GES was acquired by Kimball Electronics on 01 Oct 2018.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1,049
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Process Solutions, Inc.

17212 51st Ave NE, Arlington, WA, 98223, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Process Solutions is a control systems integrator specializing in the design, construction, programming and integration of process control systems for multitude of industries and customers throughout the USA and around the world. Specifics: - PLC/HMI Programming, SCADA Software Systems, Electrical Controls Engineering/Design, Motion Control, Vision. - 29,000ft Headquarters. - UL508 Shop with Explosion Proof Certification. - Core industries – Energy, Refrigeration, Utilities, HVAC, Water/Wastewater, Food, Pharmaceutical, Manufacturing, Information Systems. - Certified Siemens Developer, Certified Allen Bradley Solution Provider

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-equipment-services.jpeg
GES
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/process-solutions-inc-.jpeg
Process Solutions, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GES
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Process Solutions, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GES in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Process Solutions, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — GES (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GES cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Process Solutions, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Process Solutions, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-equipment-services.jpeg
GES
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/process-solutions-inc-.jpeg
Process Solutions, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GES company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Process Solutions, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Process Solutions, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GES company.

In the current year, Process Solutions, Inc. company and GES company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Process Solutions, Inc. company nor GES company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Process Solutions, Inc. company nor GES company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Process Solutions, Inc. company nor GES company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GES company nor Process Solutions, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GES nor Process Solutions, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GES company nor Process Solutions, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GES company employs more people globally than Process Solutions, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither GES nor Process Solutions, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GES nor Process Solutions, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GES nor Process Solutions, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GES nor Process Solutions, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GES nor Process Solutions, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GES nor Process Solutions, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H