Comparison Overview

GLI (Graphic Label)

VS

Ace Commercial, Inc.

GLI (Graphic Label)

110 S. Second Ave., Yakima, Washington, 98902, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Innovative Labeling Solutions with Integrity. GLI (Graphic Label LLC) is the leading provider of integrated information and labeling solutions to the fruit, produce and food processing industries. We label, tag, print, mark, scan, direct & integrate. GLI is a one-stop shop for your labeling and coding needs. We are a Northwest owned and operated business which is GLI headquartered in the heart of agricultural country in Washington State, serving the produce industry since 1993. We create solutions for fruit and produce packers and food processing plants across the country. GLI specializes in supporting the unique needs associated with getting fruit, produce and other agricultural products from the field to the table. The need for our expertise extends to other parts of the country where food production is high, from California to upstate New York. GLI is trusted across the country because we provide innovative solutions backed by the highest standards of customer service and integrity. GLI is known for providing innovative marking solutions, product labeling, and software designed for traceability and improved production efficiency. Our products and services support requirements throughout the supply chain. We enable our customers to meet their production targets, ROI requirements and food safety initiatives.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ace Commercial, Inc.

10310 Pioneer Blvd., Santa Fe Springs, CA., 90670, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

In short, I'm a facilitator of printed products. That would include that project that was due yesterday. My knowledge and experience in the industry allow me the ability to bring solutions to what in our everyday world may seen either unlikely or darn near impossible. I have extensive experience in the following areas of commercial printing. Sheet-fed, heat-set web printing, digital printing, letter press, laser printing, mailing and labeling. Products: Catalogs, brochures, newsletters, postcards, posters, labels, envelopes, signage and packaging items. My clients include local government municipalities and agencies, private industry, to non-profit organizations. To be revised soon.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gli-graphic-label-inc-.jpeg
GLI (Graphic Label)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ace-commercial-inc..jpeg
Ace Commercial, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GLI (Graphic Label)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ace Commercial, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GLI (Graphic Label) in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ace Commercial, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — GLI (Graphic Label) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GLI (Graphic Label) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ace Commercial, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ace Commercial, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gli-graphic-label-inc-.jpeg
GLI (Graphic Label)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ace-commercial-inc..jpeg
Ace Commercial, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ace Commercial, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GLI (Graphic Label) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ace Commercial, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GLI (Graphic Label) company.

In the current year, Ace Commercial, Inc. company and GLI (Graphic Label) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ace Commercial, Inc. company nor GLI (Graphic Label) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ace Commercial, Inc. company nor GLI (Graphic Label) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ace Commercial, Inc. company nor GLI (Graphic Label) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GLI (Graphic Label) company nor Ace Commercial, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GLI (Graphic Label) nor Ace Commercial, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GLI (Graphic Label) company nor Ace Commercial, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GLI (Graphic Label) company employs more people globally than Ace Commercial, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither GLI (Graphic Label) nor Ace Commercial, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GLI (Graphic Label) nor Ace Commercial, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GLI (Graphic Label) nor Ace Commercial, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GLI (Graphic Label) nor Ace Commercial, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GLI (Graphic Label) nor Ace Commercial, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GLI (Graphic Label) nor Ace Commercial, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N