Comparison Overview

Glenwood Labels

VS

Watermark Press

Glenwood Labels

117-15 Braid St, New Westminster, British Columbia, V3L 5N7, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://glenwoodlabel.com

Glenwood Labels has been a label manufacturer since 1969. For over 45 years we have served companies locally and nationally for their label and packaging needs. We pride ourselves on the quality of our products and the service we provide our customers. Our 45 years of experience allows us at Glenwood Labels to make the label process as easy as possible for our customers. From our in house graphic team to skilled sales team, we want to work with you to make sure YOUR brand stands out! We manufacture labels and tags for several different industries. In addition, we have been awarded Top 100 manufacturers in Vancouver award the past three years. To learn more about us visit www.glenwoodlabel.com

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Watermark Press

950 Tennessee Street, San Francisco, 94107, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.watermarkpress.com

This is where quality and creativity meet—and at an unparalleled value. Founded in 1989 on the simple philosophy of providing high quality printing and customer service, Watermark Press has evolved into a national print leader. On January 31, 2014, Watermark Press became an RR Donnelley Company as a result of the combination of Consolidated Graphics and RR Donnelley. At Watermark Press, you will be treated with the service and responsiveness of a dedicated, local printer, enhanced by the economic, geographic, and technical advantages of a large international organization. While many in the print industry act as marketing middlemen, Watermark Press focuses on innovative, customer-driven solutions to deliver a high return on your printing investment. Never worry about the size or scope of your needs–Watermark Press can get you connected. Sister Company Capabilities: Web, Grandformat, Lamas, QR Codes, eBooks and more.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glenwood-label.jpeg
Glenwood Labels
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/watermark-press.jpeg
Watermark Press
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Glenwood Labels
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Watermark Press
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glenwood Labels in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Watermark Press in 2025.

Incident History — Glenwood Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glenwood Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Watermark Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Watermark Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glenwood-label.jpeg
Glenwood Labels
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/watermark-press.jpeg
Watermark Press
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Glenwood Labels company and Watermark Press company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Watermark Press company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Glenwood Labels company.

In the current year, Watermark Press company and Glenwood Labels company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Watermark Press company nor Glenwood Labels company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Watermark Press company nor Glenwood Labels company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Watermark Press company nor Glenwood Labels company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Glenwood Labels company nor Watermark Press company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Glenwood Labels nor Watermark Press holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Glenwood Labels company nor Watermark Press company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Watermark Press company employs more people globally than Glenwood Labels company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Glenwood Labels nor Watermark Press holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Glenwood Labels nor Watermark Press holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Glenwood Labels nor Watermark Press holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Glenwood Labels nor Watermark Press holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Glenwood Labels nor Watermark Press holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Glenwood Labels nor Watermark Press holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References