Comparison Overview

Glenwood Dance Studio

VS

Ocala Symphony Orchestra

Glenwood Dance Studio

None
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.glenwooddancestudio.com

Glenwood Dance Studio, located in the heart of the Glenwood Arts District in Rogers Park, is a nonprofit dance studio. Our goal is to provide a warm and welcoming community for dancers to teach, learn, rehearse and perform various styles of dance in a supportive environment that appreciates the beauty in every dancer, no matter the shape, age, or skill level. We firmly believe that anyone can dance!

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ocala Symphony Orchestra

500 NE 9th St, Ocala, Florida, US, 34470
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://ocalasymphony.com

The Ocala Symphony Orchestra is an all-professional orchestra, founded in 1975. Under the baton of Maestro Matthew Wardell, the OSO performs more than 20 concerts per year, in addition to public and private ensemble performances throughout the season. In 2015, the OSO raised $3.5 million to renovate the historic Ocala City Auditorium, and opened the Reilly Arts Center. To this day, the Reilly Arts Center is the home of the Ocala Symphony Orchestra, and also hosts more than 200 concerts per year that include National and Regional touring artists. In 2022 the OSO expanded the Reilly Arts Center to include a second Black Box Theatre, as well as the Ocala Symphony Community Music Conservatory, which provides private lessons and group classes to students of all ages and backgrounds. The OSO is committed to providing enriching cultural experiences for all and has several all-access programs that provide complimentary tickets to the community to attend OSO concerts, and scholarships for students in need that want to learn an instrument or attend a music camp.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glenwood-dance-studio.jpeg
Glenwood Dance Studio
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ocala-symphony-orchestra.jpeg
Ocala Symphony Orchestra
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Glenwood Dance Studio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ocala Symphony Orchestra
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glenwood Dance Studio in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ocala Symphony Orchestra in 2025.

Incident History — Glenwood Dance Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glenwood Dance Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ocala Symphony Orchestra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ocala Symphony Orchestra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glenwood-dance-studio.jpeg
Glenwood Dance Studio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ocala-symphony-orchestra.jpeg
Ocala Symphony Orchestra
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Glenwood Dance Studio company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ocala Symphony Orchestra company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ocala Symphony Orchestra company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Glenwood Dance Studio company.

In the current year, Ocala Symphony Orchestra company and Glenwood Dance Studio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ocala Symphony Orchestra company nor Glenwood Dance Studio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ocala Symphony Orchestra company nor Glenwood Dance Studio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ocala Symphony Orchestra company nor Glenwood Dance Studio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Glenwood Dance Studio company nor Ocala Symphony Orchestra company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Glenwood Dance Studio nor Ocala Symphony Orchestra holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Glenwood Dance Studio company nor Ocala Symphony Orchestra company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ocala Symphony Orchestra company employs more people globally than Glenwood Dance Studio company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Glenwood Dance Studio nor Ocala Symphony Orchestra holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Glenwood Dance Studio nor Ocala Symphony Orchestra holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Glenwood Dance Studio nor Ocala Symphony Orchestra holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Glenwood Dance Studio nor Ocala Symphony Orchestra holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Glenwood Dance Studio nor Ocala Symphony Orchestra holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Glenwood Dance Studio nor Ocala Symphony Orchestra holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References