Comparison Overview

Glenview History Center

VS

Heritage Preservation

Glenview History Center

1121 Waukegan Road, Glenview, IL, US, 60025
Last Update: 2025-12-03

The Glenview History Center is a nonprofit organization founded in 1965. The Center aims to preserve, nurture, and promote an awareness and appreciation of the Village of Glenview's local history by conducting educational programs and providing informational services to the community. To this end, Glenview History Center maintains a farmhouse museum and library, which are open to the public weekly.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Heritage Preservation

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Our Mission: To preserve the nation’s heritage for future generations through innovative leadership, education, and programs. Heritage Preservation is a national nonprofit dedicated to preserving the cultural, historic, and scientific heritage of the United States. By identifying risks, developing innovative programs, and providing broad public access to expert advice, Heritage Preservation assists the museums, libraries, archives, organizations, and individuals that care for our endangered heritage.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glenview-history-center.jpeg
Glenview History Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heritage-preservation.jpeg
Heritage Preservation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Glenview History Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Heritage Preservation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glenview History Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Heritage Preservation in 2025.

Incident History — Glenview History Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glenview History Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Heritage Preservation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Heritage Preservation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glenview-history-center.jpeg
Glenview History Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heritage-preservation.jpeg
Heritage Preservation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Glenview History Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Heritage Preservation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Heritage Preservation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Glenview History Center company.

In the current year, Heritage Preservation company and Glenview History Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Heritage Preservation company nor Glenview History Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Heritage Preservation company nor Glenview History Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Heritage Preservation company nor Glenview History Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Glenview History Center company nor Heritage Preservation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Glenview History Center nor Heritage Preservation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Glenview History Center company nor Heritage Preservation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Heritage Preservation company employs more people globally than Glenview History Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Glenview History Center nor Heritage Preservation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Glenview History Center nor Heritage Preservation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Glenview History Center nor Heritage Preservation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Glenview History Center nor Heritage Preservation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Glenview History Center nor Heritage Preservation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Glenview History Center nor Heritage Preservation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X