Comparison Overview

Glendining Signs

VS

Litho Superpak

Glendining Signs

Unit A1 Access Twelve, Station Road, Theale, Reading, Berkshire, GB, RG7 4PN
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Glendining Signs are one of the UK’s largest sign makers, leading the Construction Signage Industry using the latest large format printers and technology to produce high-quality printed signs for many of the UK’s biggest housebuilders. With over 40 years in the industry, Glendining Signs has built a reputation for service and reliability, helping our valued customers meet their strict deadlines time and time again.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Litho Superpak

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

LITHO SUPERPAK (LSP) is an Australian owned and family run lithographic printing company with over 30 years’ experience in manufacturing packaging for many household names. Now proudly part of the Print Mefia Group, we focus on the manufacture of printed packaging, inner boxes and point of sale tools tailored to the needs of each individual customer across a variety of industries. Our printing and finishing equipment are of the highest quality German and Swiss Manufacture and capable of satisfying client orders ranging anywhere from a few hundred to several million units. Our main activities include structural design, offset printing, die cutting, high speed gluing, warehousing and logistics. We pride ourselves on the quality of product that we produce, and as such, are Certified for ISO 9001:2015 and HACCP food safety and offer FSC and PEFC Chain of Custody Certified products.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glendining-signs-ltd.jpeg
Glendining Signs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/litho-superpak-p-l.jpeg
Litho Superpak
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Glendining Signs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Litho Superpak
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glendining Signs in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Litho Superpak in 2025.

Incident History — Glendining Signs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glendining Signs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Litho Superpak (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Litho Superpak cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glendining-signs-ltd.jpeg
Glendining Signs
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/litho-superpak-p-l.jpeg
Litho Superpak
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Litho Superpak company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Glendining Signs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Litho Superpak company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Glendining Signs company.

In the current year, Litho Superpak company and Glendining Signs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Litho Superpak company nor Glendining Signs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Litho Superpak company nor Glendining Signs company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Litho Superpak company nor Glendining Signs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Glendining Signs company nor Litho Superpak company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Glendining Signs nor Litho Superpak holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Glendining Signs company nor Litho Superpak company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Glendining Signs company employs more people globally than Litho Superpak company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Glendining Signs nor Litho Superpak holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Glendining Signs nor Litho Superpak holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Glendining Signs nor Litho Superpak holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Glendining Signs nor Litho Superpak holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Glendining Signs nor Litho Superpak holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Glendining Signs nor Litho Superpak holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N