Comparison Overview

Glassberg, Pollak & Associates

VS

NEC Contracts®

Glassberg, Pollak & Associates

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Glassberg, Pollak & Associates is one of Northern California’s most experienced law firms whose practice is dedicated exclusively to representing business and commercial clients in the collection of commercial claims and enforcing their rights as creditors. Our attorneys have over 100 years combined experience in litigating collection cases. We have a broad range of experience collecting for clients in all segments of our diverse economy. Examples of creditors we represent by industry include advertising, computer software, construction, equipment leasing, insurance, manufacturing, telecommunication and transportation. We pride ourselves in keeping our clients informed on the latest developments in their cases and in delivering efficient and cost effective legal services. Allow us to implement a collection strategy tailored to your business needs.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NEC Contracts®

One Great George Street, London, SW1P 3AA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

The NEC Contracts suite is uniquely flexible and can be used for the procurement of works, services and goods across all sectors and at all stages of a project lifecycle. Our contracts promote collaboration, fair dealing and good management. Even the most high-risk and complex projects can be delivered on time, within budget and to the highest standards. NEC Contracts have successfully delivered hundreds of £ billions worth of works, services and supply around the world. NEC has been used in projects such as Crossrail and London Olympics 2012 in the United Kingdom, the Tin Shui Wai Hospital in Hong Kong, and the Wits University in South Africa. Join our forum and be a part of the official NEC users community: www.linkedin.com/groups/3378841

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glassberg-pollak-&-associates.jpeg
Glassberg, Pollak & Associates
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nec-contracts.jpeg
NEC Contracts®
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Glassberg, Pollak & Associates
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NEC Contracts®
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glassberg, Pollak & Associates in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEC Contracts® in 2025.

Incident History — Glassberg, Pollak & Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glassberg, Pollak & Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NEC Contracts® (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEC Contracts® cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glassberg-pollak-&-associates.jpeg
Glassberg, Pollak & Associates
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nec-contracts.jpeg
NEC Contracts®
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Glassberg, Pollak & Associates company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NEC Contracts® company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NEC Contracts® company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Glassberg, Pollak & Associates company.

In the current year, NEC Contracts® company and Glassberg, Pollak & Associates company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NEC Contracts® company nor Glassberg, Pollak & Associates company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NEC Contracts® company nor Glassberg, Pollak & Associates company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NEC Contracts® company nor Glassberg, Pollak & Associates company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Glassberg, Pollak & Associates company nor NEC Contracts® company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Glassberg, Pollak & Associates nor NEC Contracts® holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Glassberg, Pollak & Associates company nor NEC Contracts® company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NEC Contracts® company employs more people globally than Glassberg, Pollak & Associates company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Glassberg, Pollak & Associates nor NEC Contracts® holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Glassberg, Pollak & Associates nor NEC Contracts® holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Glassberg, Pollak & Associates nor NEC Contracts® holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Glassberg, Pollak & Associates nor NEC Contracts® holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Glassberg, Pollak & Associates nor NEC Contracts® holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Glassberg, Pollak & Associates nor NEC Contracts® holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X