Comparison Overview

Glamour

VS

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Glamour

285 Fulton St, New York, 10007, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 650 and 699

Glamour is a women's magazine published by Condé Nast Publications. Founded in 1939 in the United States, it was originally called Glamour of Hollywood. Glamour covers the stories women want—and need—to read right now, with high-quality journalism and an authentic, accessible point of view. Here, you’ll find up-to-the-instant coverage of the issues affecting women’s lives—from politics to #MeToo; fashion that is attainable; beauty—both inside and out—and a holistic approach to wellness; sex and relationships; as well as the TV, movies, books, and pop culture you’re obsessed with. Local editions are now published in numerous countries including the United Kingdom, United States, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, Russia, Greece, Poland, South Africa, Brazil, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Netherlands, Mexico. In most cases it is a monthly publication.

NAICS: 51211
NAICS Definition: Motion Picture and Video Production
Employees: 936
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Carl-Bertelsmann-Straße 270, Gütersloh, 33311, DE
Last Update: 2026-01-20

Bertelsmann ist ein Medien-, Dienstleistungs- und Bildungsunternehmen mit rund 75.000 Mitarbeitenden, das in gut 50 Ländern der Welt aktiv ist. Zum Konzernverbund gehören das Entertainment-Unternehmen RTL Group, die Buchverlagsgruppe Penguin Random House, das Musikunternehmen BMG, der Dienstleister Arvato Group, Bertelsmann Marketing Services, die Bertelsmann Education Group sowie das internationale Fondsnetzwerk Bertelsmann Investments. Das Unternehmen erzielte im Geschäftsjahr 2024 einen Umsatz von 19 Mrd. Euro. Bertelsmann steht für Kreativität und Unternehmertum. Diese Kombination ermöglicht erstklassige Medienangebote und innovative Servicelösungen, die Kunden in aller Welt begeistern. www.bertelsmann.com

NAICS: 51211
NAICS Definition: Motion Picture and Video Production
Employees: 20,317
Subsidiaries: 39
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glamour.jpeg
Glamour
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bertelsmann.jpeg
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Glamour
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Media Production Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glamour in 2026.

Incidents vs Media Production Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA in 2026.

Incident History — Glamour (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glamour cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glamour.jpeg
Glamour
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Retaliation for ignored security warnings, potential financial gain (data sold on dark web)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bertelsmann.jpeg
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Glamour company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Glamour company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company and Glamour company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company nor Glamour company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Glamour company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company nor Glamour company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Glamour company nor Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Glamour nor Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Glamour company.

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company employs more people globally than Glamour company, reflecting its scale as a Media Production.

Neither Glamour nor Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Glamour nor Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Glamour nor Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Glamour nor Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Glamour nor Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Glamour nor Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.