Comparison Overview

Gladstone Printing

VS

Royal Printing Co., Inc.

Gladstone Printing

None
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gladstoneprinting.com

About Us Gladstone Printing is a full service commercial printer able to handle any size printing project. Gladstone is located 3 miles West of downtown Lansing. The employees at Gladstone are true craftsman and take ownership of each clients' project. We specialize in short run four color printing and digital printing. Mission Statement: Our mission to exceed client expectations by providing highest quality product in a timely manner. We create long-lasting relationships with our clients so we can help them meet their goals and objectives. Company History Gladstone Printing is independently owned by Travis Millbrook. The company was purchased in 2002 from the Gladstone Family, which had owned and operated the company in Lansing for over 20 years. Entering the new century, Gladstone has embraced new digital technology. We understand that investment in technology can save client costs by improving efficiencies.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Royal Printing Co., Inc.

3200 W. Sunset Rd., Las Vegas, NV, 89118, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799
http://www.royalprinting.com

If your business deserves an experienced printing partner you can depend on, call and discover the difference Royal can make for your bottom line. Located in one of the fastest moving cities in the world, we understand the importance of meeting deadlines without sacrificing quality. Excellent client communication from dedicated customer service advisors, attention to detail, efficient work flows and two production shifts assure you quality printing and on-time delivery.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gladstone-printing.jpeg
Gladstone Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-printing-co.-inc..jpeg
Royal Printing Co., Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gladstone Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Royal Printing Co., Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gladstone Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Printing Co., Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Gladstone Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gladstone Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Royal Printing Co., Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Printing Co., Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gladstone-printing.jpeg
Gladstone Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-printing-co.-inc..jpeg
Royal Printing Co., Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gladstone Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Royal Printing Co., Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Royal Printing Co., Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gladstone Printing company.

In the current year, Royal Printing Co., Inc. company and Gladstone Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Royal Printing Co., Inc. company nor Gladstone Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Royal Printing Co., Inc. company nor Gladstone Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Royal Printing Co., Inc. company nor Gladstone Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gladstone Printing company nor Royal Printing Co., Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gladstone Printing nor Royal Printing Co., Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gladstone Printing company nor Royal Printing Co., Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Royal Printing Co., Inc. company employs more people globally than Gladstone Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Gladstone Printing nor Royal Printing Co., Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gladstone Printing nor Royal Printing Co., Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gladstone Printing nor Royal Printing Co., Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gladstone Printing nor Royal Printing Co., Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gladstone Printing nor Royal Printing Co., Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gladstone Printing nor Royal Printing Co., Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References