Comparison Overview

Gizmatic

VS

Engineering Services Group, Inc.

Gizmatic

7407 Livingston Rd, Oxon Hill, Maryland, 20745, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Gizmatic is a product development company based in the D.C. Metro area. We work with companies across the U.S., helping them to take their ideas from napkin sketch, through to functional prototypes, and into production. We do all of our design and prototyping in-house and work closely with our network of trusted and tested production partners for manufacturing scale-up.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Engineering Services Group, Inc.

900 E Hill Ave, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37915, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Engineering Services Group, Inc. is an independent professional corporation located in Knoxville, Tennessee. We are a Mechanical / Electrical Consulting Engineering firm and are considered a small business. Our primary client base is East Tennessee and Western North Carolina, but we often work beyond these boundaries. Our varied project experience is measured in decades. ESG has grown to be one of the leading Mechanical / Electrical Consulting firms in East Tennessee. The original principals have passed or retired, but their dedication to offer their clients quality services was passed down and continues today. At ESG, our primary objectives are to provide quality services, offer competitive fees, and work within the client’s time constraints. Our diverse staff of engineers and designers allows us the flexibility to work on multiple projects with parallel schedules. ESG project experience includes Industrial, Commercial, Healthcare, Educational, Military, Governmental, Religious, Hospitality, Housing, and Sustainable Designs. The magnitude and diversity of ESG can only be sampled in a project portfolio. It represents a fraction of the 250 plus projects designed by ESG each year.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gizmatic.jpeg
Gizmatic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/engineeringservicesgroupinc-.jpeg
Engineering Services Group, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gizmatic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Engineering Services Group, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gizmatic in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Engineering Services Group, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Gizmatic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gizmatic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Engineering Services Group, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Engineering Services Group, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gizmatic.jpeg
Gizmatic
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/engineeringservicesgroupinc-.jpeg
Engineering Services Group, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Gizmatic company and Engineering Services Group, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Engineering Services Group, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gizmatic company.

In the current year, Engineering Services Group, Inc. company and Gizmatic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Engineering Services Group, Inc. company nor Gizmatic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Engineering Services Group, Inc. company nor Gizmatic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Engineering Services Group, Inc. company nor Gizmatic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gizmatic company nor Engineering Services Group, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gizmatic nor Engineering Services Group, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gizmatic company nor Engineering Services Group, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Engineering Services Group, Inc. company employs more people globally than Gizmatic company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Gizmatic nor Engineering Services Group, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gizmatic nor Engineering Services Group, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gizmatic nor Engineering Services Group, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gizmatic nor Engineering Services Group, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gizmatic nor Engineering Services Group, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gizmatic nor Engineering Services Group, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H