Comparison Overview

Girls Who Code

VS

Scouts et Guides de France

Girls Who Code

Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://girlswhocode.com

Girls Who Code is an international non-profit organization working to close the gender gap in technology and change the image of what a programmer looks like and does. With their 7-week Summer Immersion Program, after school Clubs, College Loops program and New York Times best-selling series, they are leading the movement to inspire, educate, and equip young women with the computing skills to pursue 21st-century opportunities. Girls Who Code has reached 300,000 girls around the world. To join the movement or learn more, visit girlswhocode.com.

NAICS: 8134
NAICS Definition: Civic and Social Organizations
Employees: 1,445
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Scouts et Guides de France

21-37 rue de Stalingrad B√¢t. D Arcueil, France 94110, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sgdf.fr

Mouvement de jeunesse et d'éducation populaire en France, les Scouts et Guides de France sont agréés par le Ministère de la jeunesse et des Sports depuis cinquante ans. Reconnue d'utilité publique, l'association est un mouvement catholique d'éducation. Elle compte aujourd’hui 69 000 adhérents, 15 000 jeunes bénévoles de moins de 25 ans et plus de 800 équipes locales réparties sur 62 territoires en France (métropole et Dom-Tom). Les Scouts et Guides de France sont membres de l’Association Mondiale des Guides et Éclaireuses, de l’Organisation Mondiale des Mouvements Scouts, de la Fédération du Scoutisme français. Ils s’intègrent dans un réseau qui compte 38 millions de scouts dans le monde. L'Association a pour but de contribuer à l'éducation des enfants et des jeunes et à leur engagement dans la vie sociale selon le but, les principes et les méthodes du scoutisme. Elle est ouverte à toutes et tous, sans distinction de nationalité, de culture, d'origine sociale ou de croyance.

NAICS: 813
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/girlswhocode.jpeg
Girls Who Code
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scouts-et-guides-de-france.jpeg
Scouts et Guides de France
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Girls Who Code
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Scouts et Guides de France
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civic and Social Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Girls Who Code in 2025.

Incidents vs Civic and Social Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scouts et Guides de France in 2025.

Incident History — Girls Who Code (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Girls Who Code cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Scouts et Guides de France (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scouts et Guides de France cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/girlswhocode.jpeg
Girls Who Code
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Deception and Coercion
Motivation: Financial Gain and Exploitation
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scouts-et-guides-de-france.jpeg
Scouts et Guides de France
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Scouts et Guides de France company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Girls Who Code company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Girls Who Code company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Scouts et Guides de France company has not reported any.

In the current year, Scouts et Guides de France company and Girls Who Code company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Scouts et Guides de France company nor Girls Who Code company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Girls Who Code company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Scouts et Guides de France company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Scouts et Guides de France company nor Girls Who Code company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Girls Who Code company nor Scouts et Guides de France company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Girls Who Code nor Scouts et Guides de France holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Girls Who Code company nor Scouts et Guides de France company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Scouts et Guides de France company employs more people globally than Girls Who Code company, reflecting its scale as a Civic and Social Organizations.

Neither Girls Who Code nor Scouts et Guides de France holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Girls Who Code nor Scouts et Guides de France holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Girls Who Code nor Scouts et Guides de France holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Girls Who Code nor Scouts et Guides de France holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Girls Who Code nor Scouts et Guides de France holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Girls Who Code nor Scouts et Guides de France holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References