Comparison Overview

Gillman Strategic Group

VS

CKA Advocacia

Gillman Strategic Group

815 E Broad St, Westfield, 07090, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Gillman Strategic Group, LLC is a “law firm matchmaker” that helps successful partners find a better fit at a new firm. We work with individual partners and groups who have their own clients, but struggle with effectively representing those clients and maximizing their own compensation, because their current firm is simply the wrong fit. We do the research for these busy professionals to help them find a firm that addresses their issues with rate flexibility, additional specialty areas, cross-selling opportunities, ability to attract and retain the right team, or general firm culture. What separates our service from other legal recruiters is the combination of Jennifer Gillman’s 12 years of law firm practice, almost 10 years as a legal recruiter with a personal interest in matchmaking. Because of this, clients receive a long-term teammate who will do the legwork they don’t have time for and help them narrow down the options to find their perfect law firm match.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CKA Advocacia

Avenida Carlos Gomes 258, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90480-000, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

A CKA é uma empresa que oferece solução personalizada às necessidades de seus clientes, nos mais variados segmentos de mercado, aliando expertise e agilidade. Hoje assessoramos empresas nacionais de grande, médio e pequeno porte, representando os interesses dos seus controladores, acionistas e demais integrantes do quadro societário. Representamos no Brasil, ainda, empresas de capital estrangeiro, as quais assessoramos desde seu processo de instalação, escolha do modelo societário, registro de investimentos estrangeiros no Banco Central do Brasil, até a efetiva implantação e operação de suas atividades. Reunimos experiência, teoria e prática para fazer a diferença no seu negócio e alcançar o sucesso desejado. Nossa qualificada equipe de trabalho conta com profissionais conhecedores das mais diversas áreas do Direito, o que nos permite oferecer um serviço ágil e integral. É desta maneira que a CKA desempenha suas atividades, focada nas soluções e na satisfação dos seus clientes.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gillman-strategic-group.jpeg
Gillman Strategic Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cka---carlos-kirchhof-advocacia.jpeg
CKA Advocacia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gillman Strategic Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CKA Advocacia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gillman Strategic Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CKA Advocacia in 2025.

Incident History — Gillman Strategic Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gillman Strategic Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CKA Advocacia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CKA Advocacia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gillman-strategic-group.jpeg
Gillman Strategic Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cka---carlos-kirchhof-advocacia.jpeg
CKA Advocacia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CKA Advocacia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gillman Strategic Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CKA Advocacia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gillman Strategic Group company.

In the current year, CKA Advocacia company and Gillman Strategic Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CKA Advocacia company nor Gillman Strategic Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CKA Advocacia company nor Gillman Strategic Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CKA Advocacia company nor Gillman Strategic Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gillman Strategic Group company nor CKA Advocacia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gillman Strategic Group nor CKA Advocacia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gillman Strategic Group company nor CKA Advocacia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CKA Advocacia company employs more people globally than Gillman Strategic Group company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Gillman Strategic Group nor CKA Advocacia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gillman Strategic Group nor CKA Advocacia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gillman Strategic Group nor CKA Advocacia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gillman Strategic Group nor CKA Advocacia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gillman Strategic Group nor CKA Advocacia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gillman Strategic Group nor CKA Advocacia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X