Comparison Overview

Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd

VS

Aerosoft

Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd

Canal Head North, Kendal, Cumbria, GB, LA9 7BZ
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Gilkes delivers innovative, single source solutions to the Small Hydropower and High Horsepower Engine markets. Working meticulously with our customers to ensure the very best in product design, total cost of ownership and operational excellence, our range of Hydropower turbines and engine cooling pumps deliver solutions to meet the most demanding of technical specifications and environments. With international credentials earned in over 85 countries, a Royal Warrant and over 165 years of design and manufacturing experience behind us, we are small enough to be agile and responsive, whilst large enough to have the technical and engineering competence needed to be one of the world’s leading brands.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 115
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Aerosoft

Centro Direzionale Isola E/7, Naples, Naples, 80143, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Aerosoft S.p.A. is an Engineering and Manufacturing Company operating in Aerospace, Automotive, Rail, and Biomedical sectors owned by Trefin Group. The Company is composed by four Divisions, with a technical management highly experienced in each field. The Company offers Design and Calculation services and is able to cover the whole design cycle starting from the Customer's requirements up to manufacturing support. Aerosoft Engineers perform: Design and Stress Analysis of Primary and Secondary Structure, Fatigue, Finite Element Modelling, CFD and Crash Analysis and also all the CAD-CAM activities.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 246
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gilbert-gilkes-and-gordon-ltd.jpeg
Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aerosoft.jpeg
Aerosoft
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aerosoft
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aerosoft in 2025.

Incident History — Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aerosoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aerosoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gilbert-gilkes-and-gordon-ltd.jpeg
Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aerosoft.jpeg
Aerosoft
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aerosoft company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Aerosoft company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd company.

In the current year, Aerosoft company and Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aerosoft company nor Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aerosoft company nor Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Aerosoft company nor Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd company nor Aerosoft company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd nor Aerosoft holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd company nor Aerosoft company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Aerosoft company employs more people globally than Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd nor Aerosoft holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd nor Aerosoft holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd nor Aerosoft holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd nor Aerosoft holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd nor Aerosoft holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gilbert Gilkes and Gordon Ltd nor Aerosoft holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H