Comparison Overview

Gila River Indian Community

VS

PENILLA IP, APC

Gila River Indian Community

Sacaton, 85247, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Criminal Division of the Law Office is comprised of prosecuting attorneys who represent the Gila River Indian Community in criminal prosecutions and civil code enforcement matters in the Community’s courts. Prosecutors from the Law Office enforce the Community’s Law and Order Code, including the criminal code, traffic code, children’s code, mental health code and civil trespass code. The prosecutors file criminal and civil complaints ranging from minor offenses to violent crimes.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 771
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PENILLA IP, APC

710 Lakeway DR., Sunnyvale, CALIFORNIA, 94085, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

PENILLA IP, APC is boutique law firm specializing in intellectual property (IP), with a focus on patent prosecution, trademarks, and IP counseling. PENILLA IP has been providing IP services for large and small technology companies for over 20 years. As a boutique law firm, we also pride ourselves in being quick to respond and flexible in the way we deliver our services. Simply put, our mission is to exceed our client’s expectations in every way. We look forward to working with you soon.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gila-river-indian-community.jpeg
Gila River Indian Community
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/martine-penilla-group-llp.jpeg
PENILLA IP, APC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gila River Indian Community
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PENILLA IP, APC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gila River Indian Community in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PENILLA IP, APC in 2025.

Incident History — Gila River Indian Community (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gila River Indian Community cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PENILLA IP, APC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PENILLA IP, APC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gila-river-indian-community.jpeg
Gila River Indian Community
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/martine-penilla-group-llp.jpeg
PENILLA IP, APC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gila River Indian Community company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PENILLA IP, APC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PENILLA IP, APC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gila River Indian Community company.

In the current year, PENILLA IP, APC company and Gila River Indian Community company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PENILLA IP, APC company nor Gila River Indian Community company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PENILLA IP, APC company nor Gila River Indian Community company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PENILLA IP, APC company nor Gila River Indian Community company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gila River Indian Community company nor PENILLA IP, APC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gila River Indian Community nor PENILLA IP, APC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gila River Indian Community company nor PENILLA IP, APC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gila River Indian Community company employs more people globally than PENILLA IP, APC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Gila River Indian Community nor PENILLA IP, APC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gila River Indian Community nor PENILLA IP, APC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gila River Indian Community nor PENILLA IP, APC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gila River Indian Community nor PENILLA IP, APC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gila River Indian Community nor PENILLA IP, APC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gila River Indian Community nor PENILLA IP, APC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X