Comparison Overview

Gibbs Houston Pauw

VS

Lodders Solicitors LLP

Gibbs Houston Pauw

Seattle, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

The firm limits its practice to immigration representation of all types, including employment related visas, family visa, asylum, naturalization, removal defense, and employer sanctions. We have a substantial immigration litigation practice to appeal government decisions, compel timely adjudication, and to defeat deportation. We have worked on a dozen class actions to obtain positive changes in immigration procedures.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lodders Solicitors LLP

Number Ten, Elm Court, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire, CV37 6PA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

For over 240 years, we’ve been delivering the legal advice our clients need, when they need it. Lodders is an established and thriving law firm that is built on providing outstanding legal advice to private individuals and private business. Based in Stratford upon Avon with offices in Cheltenham, Birmingham and Henley in Arden. We have a reputation for thoughtful, intelligent advice and a highly personal service. Our 25 partners spearhead specialist legal teams across: - Agricultural law and landed estates - Private client work - Dispute resolution - Business and commercial law - Commercial property - Employment law - Charity law - Family law We enjoy taking an active role in our local community, whether through our charitable work with the Heart of England Community Foundation or by sponsoring and attending events such as the Moreton Show and the Stratford 'Big 10k'​, and we pride ourselves on our personal service and friendly approach.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 162
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Gibbs Houston Pauw
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lodders-solicitors-llp.jpeg
Lodders Solicitors LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gibbs Houston Pauw
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lodders Solicitors LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gibbs Houston Pauw in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lodders Solicitors LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Gibbs Houston Pauw (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gibbs Houston Pauw cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lodders Solicitors LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lodders Solicitors LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Gibbs Houston Pauw
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lodders-solicitors-llp.jpeg
Lodders Solicitors LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Gibbs Houston Pauw company and Lodders Solicitors LLP company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Lodders Solicitors LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gibbs Houston Pauw company.

In the current year, Lodders Solicitors LLP company and Gibbs Houston Pauw company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lodders Solicitors LLP company nor Gibbs Houston Pauw company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lodders Solicitors LLP company nor Gibbs Houston Pauw company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lodders Solicitors LLP company nor Gibbs Houston Pauw company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gibbs Houston Pauw company nor Lodders Solicitors LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gibbs Houston Pauw nor Lodders Solicitors LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gibbs Houston Pauw company nor Lodders Solicitors LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lodders Solicitors LLP company employs more people globally than Gibbs Houston Pauw company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Gibbs Houston Pauw nor Lodders Solicitors LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gibbs Houston Pauw nor Lodders Solicitors LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gibbs Houston Pauw nor Lodders Solicitors LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gibbs Houston Pauw nor Lodders Solicitors LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gibbs Houston Pauw nor Lodders Solicitors LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gibbs Houston Pauw nor Lodders Solicitors LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X