Comparison Overview

GGZ

VS

Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc.

GGZ

Vondelstraat 54, Amsterdam, 1054 GE, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ggz.nl

GGZ is het nationale adviesbureau voor bestuurders, praktijkhouders en ondernemers in de geestelijke gezondheidszorg. We denken graag mee over visiegerichte structurering van kleinschalige zorgverlening. Organisatieadviseurs werken in GGZ samen met BIG-geregistreerde therapeuten, PhD onderzoekers en zorgondernemers. GGZ-LinkedIn is het uithangbord van GGZ en Stichting Kleinschalige ggz. Het kanaal toont een selectie van wetenswaardigheden uit de organisatie en geestelijke gezondheidszorg in bredere zin. GGZ: KVK 72181400, ggz.nl & ggz.be

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 725
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc.

90 E 200 N, Logan, 84321, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://brmh.com

A mental health service organization serving residents of Cache, Rich, and Box Elder Counties in Utah for over four decades. Open to all individuals, regardless of age or ability to pay, who are experiencing a mental health crisis. Staff consists of mental health therapists, case managers, family resource facilitator/peer support specialists, physicians/nurse practitioners, nurses and medical assistants. Services are provided in a team approach and are also available to under/uninsured, individuals involved in the legal system, and all Medicaid eligible individuals. Treatment planning may include assessment, psychotherapy (individual/group/family), psychological testing, skills development, psycho-social rehabilitation, behavior management, case management, peer support, respite, medication management, residential/housing, drop-in centers, and more. A sliding fee schedule is available, as are interpretation services.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ggz.jpeg
GGZ
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bear-river-mental-health-services-inc.jpeg
Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GGZ
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GGZ in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — GGZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GGZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ggz.jpeg
GGZ
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bear-river-mental-health-services-inc.jpeg
Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GGZ company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GGZ company.

In the current year, Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. company and GGZ company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. company nor GGZ company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. company nor GGZ company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. company nor GGZ company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GGZ company nor Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GGZ nor Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GGZ company nor Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GGZ company employs more people globally than Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither GGZ nor Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GGZ nor Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GGZ nor Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GGZ nor Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GGZ nor Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GGZ nor Bear River Mental Health Services, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References