Comparison Overview

GGZ In de Bres

VS

Center Point GA, Inc.

GGZ In de Bres

Zonnedauw 5, Drachten, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.indebres.nl

GGZ In de Bres is een jonge organisatie met een hoog ambitieniveau met vestigingen in Drachten, Groningen, Assen en Lelystad. Op dit moment werken bij ons circa 100 medewerkers. Op basis van een christelijke visie bieden wij ambulante behandelingen aan kinderen, jongeren, volwassenen en ouderen vanuit diverse multidisciplinaire teams. Bovendien wordt er gewerkt met een deeltijd dagbehandelingprogramma. Onze missie: Op professionele wijze, in navolging van Christus, mensen met psychiatrische en psychosociale problemen, helpen tot heelheid te komen met zichzelf, hun omgeving en de Schepper.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 30
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Center Point GA, Inc.

1050 Elephant Trail, Gainesville, Georgia, 30501, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://centerpointga.org

Center Point has been seeking to serve the citizens of Gainesville City and Hall County for over 45 years. Though originally the brainchild of a few local churches, created with the purpose of providing off-site religion classes to public school students, the Center has slowly transformed into arguably Hall County’s most successful and diverse student-and-family-centered non-profit. Our mission is simple: enhance, strengthen, and change lives. This is what we are doing and what we will continue to do for years to come.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ggz-in-de-bres.jpeg
GGZ In de Bres
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-point-ga-inc-.jpeg
Center Point GA, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GGZ In de Bres
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center Point GA, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GGZ In de Bres in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center Point GA, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — GGZ In de Bres (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GGZ In de Bres cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center Point GA, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center Point GA, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ggz-in-de-bres.jpeg
GGZ In de Bres
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-point-ga-inc-.jpeg
Center Point GA, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center Point GA, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GGZ In de Bres company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center Point GA, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GGZ In de Bres company.

In the current year, Center Point GA, Inc. company and GGZ In de Bres company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center Point GA, Inc. company nor GGZ In de Bres company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center Point GA, Inc. company nor GGZ In de Bres company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center Point GA, Inc. company nor GGZ In de Bres company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GGZ In de Bres company nor Center Point GA, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GGZ In de Bres nor Center Point GA, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GGZ In de Bres company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Center Point GA, Inc. company.

GGZ In de Bres company employs more people globally than Center Point GA, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither GGZ In de Bres nor Center Point GA, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GGZ In de Bres nor Center Point GA, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GGZ In de Bres nor Center Point GA, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GGZ In de Bres nor Center Point GA, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GGZ In de Bres nor Center Point GA, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GGZ In de Bres nor Center Point GA, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References