Comparison Overview

GGZ Friesland

VS

Insight Family Center, LLC

GGZ Friesland

Marshallweg 9, Leeuwarden, 8912 AC, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

GGZ Friesland is dé organisatie voor geestelijke gezondheidszorg in de provincie Friesland. Wij zijn er voor de mensen die ons het hardste nodig hebben. Jaarlijks maken meer dan 20.000 mensen gebruik van onze zorg. Van thuiszorg tot tijdelijk opname in een kliniek, van groepstherapie tot een deeltijdbehandeling - de hulp die GGZ Friesland kan bieden is breed en gevarieerd. Er zijn aparte mogelijkheden voor kinderen en jongeren, volwassenen en ouderen. De zorg is in eerste instantie gericht op herstel van een stoornis. Is herstel niet mogelijk, dan begeleiden we mensen gedurende langere tijd. Samen met hen proberen we hun problemen dragelijk te maken en ervoor te zorgen dat ze (beter) kunnen meedraaien in de maatschappij. GGZ Friesland is één van de grootste werkgevers in Friesland. Wij zijn een erkend opleidingsinstituut voor psychiaters, psychologen en verpleegkundig specialisten. Toegepast wetenschappelijk onderzoek speelt een belangrijke rol om behandelingen te evalueren en te verbeteren.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 1,342
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Insight Family Center, LLC

5884 Faringdon Place, Raleigh, NC, 27609, US
Last Update: 2025-12-29

At Insight Family Center, LLC we provide premium mental health and substance abuse services. Our priority is to provide our clients with techniques that will assist them in obtaining their desired outcomes to become healthy citizens. Offer the highest quality of experienced professionals in a safe, comfortable and Double Brace: “The best vision is insight.” Malcom Forbes professional environment to support each client in all aspects of living a more fulfilled life through; providing the tools and support needed to identify the origin of the problem and then working together with our client’s, to reach their personal goals.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ggz-friesland.jpeg
GGZ Friesland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/insight-family-center-llc.jpeg
Insight Family Center, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GGZ Friesland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Insight Family Center, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GGZ Friesland in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Insight Family Center, LLC in 2026.

Incident History — GGZ Friesland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GGZ Friesland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Insight Family Center, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Insight Family Center, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ggz-friesland.jpeg
GGZ Friesland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/insight-family-center-llc.jpeg
Insight Family Center, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GGZ Friesland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Insight Family Center, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Insight Family Center, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GGZ Friesland company.

In the current year, Insight Family Center, LLC company and GGZ Friesland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Insight Family Center, LLC company nor GGZ Friesland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Insight Family Center, LLC company nor GGZ Friesland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Insight Family Center, LLC company nor GGZ Friesland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GGZ Friesland company nor Insight Family Center, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GGZ Friesland nor Insight Family Center, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GGZ Friesland company nor Insight Family Center, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GGZ Friesland company employs more people globally than Insight Family Center, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither GGZ Friesland nor Insight Family Center, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GGZ Friesland nor Insight Family Center, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GGZ Friesland nor Insight Family Center, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GGZ Friesland nor Insight Family Center, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GGZ Friesland nor Insight Family Center, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GGZ Friesland nor Insight Family Center, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N