Comparison Overview

GGz Centraal

VS

SUWS of the Carolinas

GGz Centraal

Utrechtseweg 266, Amersfoort, Provincie Utrecht, NL, 3818 EW
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Bij GGz Centraal rekenen elk jaar zo’n 25.000 cliënten op ons als de specialist in geestelijke gezondheidszorg. Ons werkgebied strekt zich uit over Eemland, Flevoland, Gooi & Vechtstreek en Veluwe & Veluwe Vallei. We bieden onze zorg zo dicht mogelijk bij onze patiënten aan. Om te voorkomen dat mensen met psychische problemen tussen wal en schip vallen werken wij intensief samen met algemene ziekenhuizen, forensische psychiatrie, verslavingszorg en gemeenten. Samen met bijna 3.000 collega’s willen we elke dag het verschil maken voor onze cliënten. Dit doen wij deskundig en vanuit betrokkenheid. En door te verbinden, te innoveren en op elkaar te bouwen. Zo werken we samen aan de ggz van nu én van morgen.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 2,783
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SUWS of the Carolinas

363 Graphite Rd, Old Fort, North Carolina, 28762, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

At SUWS wilderness treatment program, students work through addiction, depression, developmental disorders, and behavioral issues with experienced staff members in a supportive outdoor environment free from the stresses and distractions of everyday life. SUWS of the Carolinas operates within the Pisgah Nation Forest under permits issued by the United States Forest Service (USDA), and is subject to the USDA Civil Rights Non Discrimination agreement (Form AD-475-C).

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ggz-centraal.jpeg
GGz Centraal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suws-of-the-carolinas.jpeg
SUWS of the Carolinas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GGz Centraal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SUWS of the Carolinas
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GGz Centraal in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SUWS of the Carolinas in 2026.

Incident History — GGz Centraal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GGz Centraal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SUWS of the Carolinas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SUWS of the Carolinas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ggz-centraal.jpeg
GGz Centraal
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suws-of-the-carolinas.jpeg
SUWS of the Carolinas
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GGz Centraal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SUWS of the Carolinas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SUWS of the Carolinas company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GGz Centraal company.

In the current year, SUWS of the Carolinas company and GGz Centraal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SUWS of the Carolinas company nor GGz Centraal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SUWS of the Carolinas company nor GGz Centraal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SUWS of the Carolinas company nor GGz Centraal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GGz Centraal company nor SUWS of the Carolinas company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GGz Centraal nor SUWS of the Carolinas holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GGz Centraal company nor SUWS of the Carolinas company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GGz Centraal company employs more people globally than SUWS of the Carolinas company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither GGz Centraal nor SUWS of the Carolinas holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GGz Centraal nor SUWS of the Carolinas holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GGz Centraal nor SUWS of the Carolinas holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GGz Centraal nor SUWS of the Carolinas holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GGz Centraal nor SUWS of the Carolinas holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GGz Centraal nor SUWS of the Carolinas holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.