Comparison Overview

Hecht GGD Hollands Midden

VS

Alpina@Work

Hecht GGD Hollands Midden

Parmentieweg 49, Leiden, NL, 2316 ZV Leiden
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Hecht GGD Hollands Midden bewaakt, beschermt en bevordert de gezondheid van de inwoners van de regio Hollands Midden. Hecht bestaat uit GGD Hollands Midden, RAV Hollands Midden, GHOR Hollands Midden en het Zorg- en Veiligheidshuis Hollands Midden. De regio Hollands Midden omvat de volgende gemeenten: Alphen aan den Rijn, Bodegraven-Reeuwijk, Gouda, Hillegom, Kaag en Braassem, Katwijk, Krimpenerwaard, Leiden, Leiderdorp, Lisse, Nieuwkoop, Noordwijk, Oegstgeest, Teylingen, Voorschoten, Waddinxveen, Zuidplas, Zoeterwoude Samen doen wat nodig is | Open blik | Denken in oplossingen

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 239
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Alpina@Work

Edisonstraat 92, Doetinchem, Nederland, NL, 7006 RE
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Weet u dat u als werkgever tenminste twaalf jaar lang verantwoordelijk bent voor uw personeel bij ziekte? Ook als deze persoon niet meer bij u in dienst is? En weet u welke rechten en plichten u heeft wanneer één van uw medewerkers het heuglijke nieuws van een zwangerschap komt brengen? Als werkgever speelt u een steeds grotere rol bij het beheersen van ziekteverzuim en arbeidsongeschiktheid. De overheid trekt zich verder terug en de regelgeving verandert continu. De Verzuimeconoom begrijpt dat u niet op de hoogte kunt zijn van alle wetten en regels rondom verzuim en arbeidsongeschiktheid. Daarom houden wij die voor u bij. Als ‘spin in het web’ ontzorgen wij u bij ziekte en arbeidsongeschiktheid. Wij begeleiden u en uw medewerkers in het verzuimproces, van het moment van ziek melden tot aan het reintegratie traject en regelgeving. U geeft ons een seintje, wij doen de rest!

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ggd-hollands-midden.jpeg
Hecht GGD Hollands Midden
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alpinawork.jpeg
Alpina@Work
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hecht GGD Hollands Midden
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alpina@Work
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hecht GGD Hollands Midden in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alpina@Work in 2025.

Incident History — Hecht GGD Hollands Midden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hecht GGD Hollands Midden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alpina@Work (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alpina@Work cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ggd-hollands-midden.jpeg
Hecht GGD Hollands Midden
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alpinawork.jpeg
Alpina@Work
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hecht GGD Hollands Midden company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Alpina@Work company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Alpina@Work company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hecht GGD Hollands Midden company.

In the current year, Alpina@Work company and Hecht GGD Hollands Midden company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alpina@Work company nor Hecht GGD Hollands Midden company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alpina@Work company nor Hecht GGD Hollands Midden company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alpina@Work company nor Hecht GGD Hollands Midden company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hecht GGD Hollands Midden company nor Alpina@Work company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hecht GGD Hollands Midden nor Alpina@Work holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hecht GGD Hollands Midden company nor Alpina@Work company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hecht GGD Hollands Midden company employs more people globally than Alpina@Work company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Hecht GGD Hollands Midden nor Alpina@Work holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hecht GGD Hollands Midden nor Alpina@Work holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hecht GGD Hollands Midden nor Alpina@Work holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hecht GGD Hollands Midden nor Alpina@Work holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hecht GGD Hollands Midden nor Alpina@Work holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hecht GGD Hollands Midden nor Alpina@Work holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H