Comparison Overview

GFT Technologies

VS

Virtusa

GFT Technologies

Schelmenwasenstr. 34, Stuttgart, 70567, DE
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gft.com

GFT Technologies is an AI-centric global digital transformation company. We design advanced data and AI transformation solutions, modernize technology architectures and develop next-generation core systems for industry leaders in Banking, Insurance, Manufacturing and Robotics. Partnering closely with our clients, we push boundaries to unlock their full potential. With deep industry expertise, cutting-edge technology, and a strong partner ecosystem, GFT delivers responsible AI-centric solutions that combine engineering excellence, high-performance delivery and cost efficiency. Our team of 12,000+ technology experts operate in 20+ countries worldwide offering career opportunities at the forefront of software innovation. Let’s Go Beyond_ Legal Disclaimer: https://www.gft.com/int/en/legal-disclaimer

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 13,147
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Virtusa

132 Turnpike Road, Southborough, 01772, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.virtusa.com

Virtusa is a global product and platform engineering services company that makes experiences better with technology. We help organizations grow faster, more profitably, and more sustainably by reimagining enterprises through domain-driven solutions. We combine strategy, design, and engineering, backed by unmatched expertise at the intersection of industry, business, and technology to generate real-world business impact for clients. Headquartered in Massachusetts with global delivery centers, Virtusa provides a broad range of services, solutions, and assets, including strategy and design, AI advisory and services, digital engineering, data and analytics, digital assurance, cloud and security, cx transformation and managed services across industries such as financial services, healthcare, communications, media, entertainment, travel, manufacturing, and technology.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 17,367
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gft-technologies.jpeg
GFT Technologies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/virtusa.jpeg
Virtusa
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GFT Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Virtusa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GFT Technologies in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Virtusa in 2026.

Incident History — GFT Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GFT Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Virtusa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Virtusa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gft-technologies.jpeg
GFT Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/virtusa.jpeg
Virtusa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Virtusa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GFT Technologies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Virtusa company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GFT Technologies company.

In the current year, Virtusa company and GFT Technologies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Virtusa company nor GFT Technologies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Virtusa company nor GFT Technologies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Virtusa company nor GFT Technologies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GFT Technologies company nor Virtusa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GFT Technologies nor Virtusa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Virtusa company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GFT Technologies company.

Virtusa company employs more people globally than GFT Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither GFT Technologies nor Virtusa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GFT Technologies nor Virtusa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GFT Technologies nor Virtusa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GFT Technologies nor Virtusa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GFT Technologies nor Virtusa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GFT Technologies nor Virtusa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References