Comparison Overview

GFT Technologies

VS

UST

GFT Technologies

Schelmenwasenstr. 34, Stuttgart, 70567, DE
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gft.com

GFT Technologies is an AI-centric global digital transformation company. We design advanced data and AI transformation solutions, modernize technology architectures and develop next-generation core systems for industry leaders in Banking, Insurance, Manufacturing and Robotics. Partnering closely with our clients, we push boundaries to unlock their full potential. With deep industry expertise, cutting-edge technology, and a strong partner ecosystem, GFT delivers responsible AI-centric solutions that combine engineering excellence, high-performance delivery and cost efficiency. Our team of 12,000+ technology experts operate in 20+ countries worldwide offering career opportunities at the forefront of software innovation. Let’s Go Beyond_ Legal Disclaimer: https://www.gft.com/int/en/legal-disclaimer

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 13,147
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

UST

5 Polaris Way, Aliso Viejo, CA, US, 92656
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849
http://www.ust.com

UST is a global digital transformation solutions provider. For more than 20 years, UST has worked side by side with the world’s best companies to make a real impact through transformation. Powered by technology, inspired by people and led by purpose, UST partners with their clients from design to operation. With deep domain expertise and a future-proof philosophy, UST embeds innovation and agility into their clients’ organizations. With over 30K+ employees in 30+ countries, UST builds for boundless impact—touching billions of lives in the process.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 39,182
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gft-technologies.jpeg
GFT Technologies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ustglobal.jpeg
UST
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GFT Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UST
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GFT Technologies in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UST in 2026.

Incident History — GFT Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GFT Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UST (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UST cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gft-technologies.jpeg
GFT Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ustglobal.jpeg
UST
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

UST company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GFT Technologies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, UST company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GFT Technologies company.

In the current year, UST company and GFT Technologies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither UST company nor GFT Technologies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither UST company nor GFT Technologies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither UST company nor GFT Technologies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GFT Technologies company nor UST company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GFT Technologies nor UST holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UST company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GFT Technologies company.

UST company employs more people globally than GFT Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither GFT Technologies nor UST holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GFT Technologies nor UST holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GFT Technologies nor UST holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GFT Technologies nor UST holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GFT Technologies nor UST holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GFT Technologies nor UST holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References