Comparison Overview

GFR

VS

Musselwhite Photography Ltd

GFR

None
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 800 and 849

Photographer Agent working in Advertising, Catalog, Print & Editorial. We nurture clients, create and execute ideas and mostly give a supreme performance which makes us a fantastic company to work with. Since we have been working in New York City for the last 15 years, we have unlimited recources and work with only the best support staff that is able to complete our clients vision. My photographers are at their top of their game. Expert technicians and forward thinkers. My #1 goal is to make a clients vision come to life and guarantee that they are thoroughly happy with the final Product. I love what I do! Could not think of doing anything else with my life!

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 135
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Musselwhite Photography Ltd

17 Fairway Business Centre, Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO3 5NU, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-10

We are an Award Winning professional and personable photography studio in the South that works across all disciplines. James Musselwhite was recently awarded Photographer of The Year at the SWPP with raw in camera artistry proving his skills in the craft. With experience in beautiful creative photography and videography we work with clients to bring your vision to life. We work both in our bespoke studio and on location with a collaborative approach to bring personality to brands in creative ways.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gfr.jpeg
GFR
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/closer-photography.jpeg
Musselwhite Photography Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GFR
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Musselwhite Photography Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GFR in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Musselwhite Photography Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — GFR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GFR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Musselwhite Photography Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Musselwhite Photography Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gfr.jpeg
GFR
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/closer-photography.jpeg
Musselwhite Photography Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GFR company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Musselwhite Photography Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Musselwhite Photography Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GFR company.

In the current year, Musselwhite Photography Ltd company and GFR company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Musselwhite Photography Ltd company nor GFR company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Musselwhite Photography Ltd company nor GFR company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Musselwhite Photography Ltd company nor GFR company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GFR company nor Musselwhite Photography Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GFR nor Musselwhite Photography Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither GFR company nor Musselwhite Photography Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GFR company employs more people globally than Musselwhite Photography Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither GFR nor Musselwhite Photography Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GFR nor Musselwhite Photography Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GFR nor Musselwhite Photography Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GFR nor Musselwhite Photography Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GFR nor Musselwhite Photography Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GFR nor Musselwhite Photography Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N