Comparison Overview

GE Vernova

VS

Windlift

GE Vernova

58 Charles St, None, Boston, Massachusetts, US, 02141
Last Update: 2025-12-09

GE Vernova is a purpose-built energy technology company on a mission to electrify and decarbonize the world. It is made up of three businesses -- Power, Wind, and Electrification -- with focus on accelerating the path to more reliable, affordable, and sustainable energy, while helping our customers power economies and deliver the electricity that is vital to health, safety, security, and improved quality of life. The world needs more energy, smarter energy. With energy demand expected to grow by more than 50% in the next 20 years, we are continuously innovating to meet the moment…like we have for the past 130 years. The Energy of Change and relentless optimism are what drive us – it’s about never giving up and seeing what’s possible so that we deliver the energy technologies the world needs right now and for generations to come. GE Vernova’s attitude and edge is embedded in its name. We retain our treasured legacy, “GE,” as an enduring and hard-earned badge of quality and ingenuity. “Ver” / “verde” signal Earth’s verdant and lush ecosystems. “Nova,” from the Latin “novus,” nods to a new, innovative era of lower carbon energy that GE Vernova will help deliver. Together, we have the energy to change the world.

NAICS: 22111
NAICS Definition: Electric Power Generation
Employees: 57,523
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Windlift

2445 S Alston Ave, Durham, North Carolina, 27713, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

We are a wind energy engineering and computer software company developing Airborne Power Generators (APGs). The Windlift APG is an Airborne Wind Energy (AWE) system that uses a tethered wing with onboard rotors to generate electricity from the wind. Windlift APGs operate by harnessing the same wind power as a traditional turbine, but with only 10% of the materials, potentially making them the highest energy density (wh/kg) for any renewable energy system in windy environments.

NAICS: 22111
NAICS Definition: Electric Power Generation
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gevernova.jpeg
GE Vernova
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/windlift.jpeg
Windlift
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GE Vernova
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Windlift
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Electric Power Generation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GE Vernova in 2025.

Incidents vs Electric Power Generation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Windlift in 2025.

Incident History — GE Vernova (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GE Vernova cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Windlift (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Windlift cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gevernova.jpeg
GE Vernova
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/windlift.jpeg
Windlift
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GE Vernova company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Windlift company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Windlift company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GE Vernova company.

In the current year, Windlift company and GE Vernova company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Windlift company nor GE Vernova company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Windlift company nor GE Vernova company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Windlift company nor GE Vernova company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GE Vernova company nor Windlift company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GE Vernova nor Windlift holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GE Vernova company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Windlift company.

GE Vernova company employs more people globally than Windlift company, reflecting its scale as a Electric Power Generation.

Neither GE Vernova nor Windlift holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GE Vernova nor Windlift holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GE Vernova nor Windlift holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GE Vernova nor Windlift holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GE Vernova nor Windlift holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GE Vernova nor Windlift holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N