Comparison Overview

Getlink

VS

Network Rail

Getlink

37-39, Rue de la Bienfaisance, Paris, 75008, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

On November 20th, Groupe Eurotunnel has changed its name to Getlink. This new name, reflecting the dynamism of connection and exchange, marks the Group’s passage into an exciting new era for mobility infrastructures. Getlink now leads the businesses of four major commercial brands: - Eurotunnel, the leader across the Channel with Eurotunnel Le Shuttle and Eurotunnel Le Shuttle Freight, - Europorte, the leading private rail freight operator in France, - ElecLink, the future electrical interconnector between the UK and France, - CIFFCO, the leading private European railway training centre. Each year, Getlink safely transports more than 22 million passengers, 1.7 million trucks, 2.7 million cars, almost 2 billion tonne-kilometres of freight and, soon, also 1 gigawatt of electricity.

NAICS: 482
NAICS Definition: Rail Transportation
Employees: 2,025
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Network Rail

The Quadrant MK, Elder Gate, Milton Keynes, Bucks, GB, MK9 1EN
Last Update: 2025-11-26

We’re at the heart of revitalising Britain’s railway, getting people and goods where they need to be and supporting the economy. Investment and modernisation are essential. So we’re building the railway of the future, running a safe, reliable and efficient railway, and serving customers and communities. Our vision is Putting Passengers First – becoming a company that’s on the side of passengers and freight users. Find out more here - https://www.networkrail.co.uk/who-we-are/?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=social-profiles Naturally, we’re constantly seeking new talent to help us achieve our ambitious goals. Views expressed by those identifying themselves as Network Rail employees do not necessarily reflect those of the organisation.

NAICS: 482
NAICS Definition: Rail Transportation
Employees: 27,414
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/network-rail.jpeg
Network Rail
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Getlink
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Network Rail
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Getlink in 2025.

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Network Rail in 2025.

Incident History — Getlink (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Getlink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Network Rail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Network Rail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/getlink.jpeg
Getlink
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/network-rail.jpeg
Network Rail
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Network Rail company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Getlink company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Network Rail company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Getlink company.

In the current year, Network Rail company and Getlink company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Network Rail company nor Getlink company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Network Rail company nor Getlink company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Network Rail company nor Getlink company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Getlink company nor Network Rail company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Getlink nor Network Rail holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Getlink company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Network Rail company.

Network Rail company employs more people globally than Getlink company, reflecting its scale as a Rail Transportation.

Neither Getlink nor Network Rail holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Getlink nor Network Rail holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Getlink nor Network Rail holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Getlink nor Network Rail holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Getlink nor Network Rail holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Getlink nor Network Rail holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H