Comparison Overview

Historic Germanna

VS

Museum of Science & Technology (MOST)

Historic Germanna

P.O. Box 279, Locust Grove, Virginia, 22508, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Historic Germanna, formerly known as the Germanna Foundation, is a non-profit organization dedicated to preserving and sharing Virginia's rich historical heritage. Through its historic, natural, and cultural resources, Historic Germanna offers diverse audiences experiential, educational, and wellness opportunities. Sites include the Fort Germanna Visitor Center & Hitt Archaeology Center, Siegen Forest Trail System, Fort Germanna Archaeology Site, "Enchanted Castle" Archaeology Site, Salubria Manor, Peter Hitt Farm, and more. Historic Germanna is committed to ensuring accessibility and promoting a deeper understanding of shared history among multiple communities. Learn more at Germanna.org. Historic Germanna is a 501-c-3 nonprofit organization Donations are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law. The Foundation’s non-profit tax ID number is 54-6048585.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Museum of Science & Technology (MOST)

500 S. Franklin St., Syracuse, NY, 13202, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The MOST is built on a foundation of providing hands-on STEAM education throughout the Central New York community. Centrally located in downtown Syracuse, the MOST welcomes visitors from across Central New York and the world. The museum welcomes nearly 120,000 visitors annually, with approximately 2,000 annual members. Mission: To provide informal science learning experiences that ignite curiosity, encourage discovery, and inspire investigation. Vision: The MOST will be an innovative science and technology center, inspiring all generations through hands-on education and entertainment.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/germanna-foundation.jpeg
Historic Germanna
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mostsyracuse.jpeg
Museum of Science & Technology (MOST)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Historic Germanna
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Museum of Science & Technology (MOST)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Germanna in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) in 2025.

Incident History — Historic Germanna (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Germanna cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/germanna-foundation.jpeg
Historic Germanna
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mostsyracuse.jpeg
Museum of Science & Technology (MOST)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Historic Germanna company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Historic Germanna company.

In the current year, Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) company and Historic Germanna company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) company nor Historic Germanna company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) company nor Historic Germanna company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) company nor Historic Germanna company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Historic Germanna company nor Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Historic Germanna nor Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Historic Germanna company nor Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) company employs more people globally than Historic Germanna company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Historic Germanna nor Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Historic Germanna nor Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Historic Germanna nor Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Historic Germanna nor Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Historic Germanna nor Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Historic Germanna nor Museum of Science & Technology (MOST) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X