Comparison Overview

German Marshall Fund of the United States

VS

China Development Institute

German Marshall Fund of the United States

1744 R Street NW, Washington, DC, 20009, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) is a non-partisan American public policy and grantmaking institution dedicated to promoting better understanding and cooperation between North America and Europe on transatlantic and global issues. GMF does this by supporting individuals and institutions working in the transatlantic sphere, by convening leaders and members of the policy and business communities, by contributing research and analysis on transatlantic topics, and by providing exchange opportunities to foster renewed commitment to the transatlantic relationship. In addition, GMF supports a number of initiatives to strengthen democracies. Founded in 1972 through a gift from Germany as a permanent memorial to Marshall Plan assistance, GMF maintains a strong presence on both sides of the Atlantic. In addition to its headquarters in Washington, DC, GMF has six offices in Europe: Berlin, Paris, Brussels, Belgrade, Ankara, and Bucharest. GMF also has smaller representations in Bratislava, Turin, and Stockholm.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 967
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

China Development Institute

St.1, Jinhu Rd., Silver Lake, Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN, 518029
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

China Development Institute (CDI), a think tank based in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, was founded in 1989 with the approval of the State Council to promote China's reform and opening-up, and to expand international academic exchange and cooperation. The mission set by its founders is to conduct high-quality and independent research to provide innovative insight and practical recommendations for business and public policy leaders. Since it was established, CDI has been committing to the exploration of a new route for Chinese research and consultation organizations through reform and institutional innovation that fits China's actual conditions. CDI has grown to become one of the leading think tanks in China for its problem-solving research and consulting service. CDI gathers together 100 full-time staff and with a network of affiliated scholars and experts. Mr. Xiang Huaicheng, Former Minister, Ministry of Finance, is the Chairman and Prof. Fan Gang, a noted economist in China, is the president.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/german-marshall-fund-of-the-united-states.jpeg
German Marshall Fund of the United States
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-development-institute.jpeg
China Development Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
German Marshall Fund of the United States
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
China Development Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for German Marshall Fund of the United States in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Development Institute in 2025.

Incident History — German Marshall Fund of the United States (X = Date, Y = Severity)

German Marshall Fund of the United States cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — China Development Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Development Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/german-marshall-fund-of-the-united-states.jpeg
German Marshall Fund of the United States
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-development-institute.jpeg
China Development Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

German Marshall Fund of the United States company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to China Development Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, China Development Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to German Marshall Fund of the United States company.

In the current year, China Development Institute company and German Marshall Fund of the United States company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither China Development Institute company nor German Marshall Fund of the United States company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither China Development Institute company nor German Marshall Fund of the United States company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither China Development Institute company nor German Marshall Fund of the United States company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither German Marshall Fund of the United States company nor China Development Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither German Marshall Fund of the United States nor China Development Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither German Marshall Fund of the United States company nor China Development Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

German Marshall Fund of the United States company employs more people globally than China Development Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither German Marshall Fund of the United States nor China Development Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither German Marshall Fund of the United States nor China Development Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither German Marshall Fund of the United States nor China Development Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither German Marshall Fund of the United States nor China Development Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither German Marshall Fund of the United States nor China Development Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither German Marshall Fund of the United States nor China Development Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X