Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant
Last Update: 2026-02-25
Between 750 and 799
None
NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Comparison Overview
Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant
VS
Panda Restaurant Group
Panda Restaurant Group
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 700 and 749
Panda Restaurant Group is the global leader in Asian dining and includes Panda Express, Panda Inn, and more. Founded in 1973 by Andrew and Peggy Cherng, we are a family-owned business with more than 2,600 restaurants worldwide. Our mission is to deliver exceptional Asian dining experiences by building an organization where people are inspired to better their lives.
NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 17,796
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Panda Restaurant Group
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Panda Restaurant Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant in 2026.
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Panda Restaurant Group in 2026.
Incident History — Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — Panda Restaurant Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Panda Restaurant Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
FAQ
Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Panda Restaurant Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.
Panda Restaurant Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant company has not reported any.
In the current year, Panda Restaurant Group company and Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant company have not reported any cyber incidents.
Neither Panda Restaurant Group company nor Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.
Panda Restaurant Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Neither Panda Restaurant Group company nor Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.
Neither Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant company nor Panda Restaurant Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.
Neither Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant nor Panda Restaurant Group holds any compliance certifications.
Neither company holds any compliance certifications.
Panda Restaurant Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant company.
Panda Restaurant Group company employs more people globally than Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.
Neither Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant nor Panda Restaurant Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.
Neither Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant nor Panda Restaurant Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Neither Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant nor Panda Restaurant Group holds ISO 27001 certification.
Neither Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant nor Panda Restaurant Group holds PCI DSS certification.
Neither Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant nor Panda Restaurant Group holds HIPAA certification.
Neither Gepetto S Pizza Restaurant nor Panda Restaurant Group holds GDPR certification.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
