Comparison Overview

Geoswap

VS

Diebold Nixdorf

Geoswap

1313 N Market St, Wilmington, US
Last Update: 2026-03-03
Between 750 and 799

Acquired by Goldfish Ads (2019) https://www.goldfishads.com/ Traditional event sponsorships are expensive, time-consuming, and hard to quantify the return on investment. GeoSwap helps brands get a digital presence at events. People who attend the events will see your brand's ads on their Fb, Instagram, and Snapchat feed. Since it's a digital presence we don't have to be affiliated with the events, and with our extensive event database brands can have a presence at events all across the country.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Diebold Nixdorf

350 Orchard Ave NE, North Canton, 44720, US
Last Update: 2026-03-29
Between 650 and 699

Diebold Nixdorf automates, digitizes and transforms the way people bank and shop. Its integrated solutions connect digital and physical channels conveniently, securely and efficiently for millions of consumers every day. As an innovation partner for nearly all of the world's top 100 financial institutions and a majority of the top 25 global retailers, Diebold Nixdorf delivers unparalleled services and technology that power the daily operations and consumer experience of financial institutions and retailers around the world.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 20,251
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geoswap.jpeg
Geoswap
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diebold.jpeg
Diebold Nixdorf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Geoswap
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Diebold Nixdorf
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Geoswap in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Diebold Nixdorf in 2026.

Incident History — Geoswap (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Geoswap cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Diebold Nixdorf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Diebold Nixdorf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geoswap.jpeg
Geoswap
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diebold.jpeg
Diebold Nixdorf
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Hard Drive Encryption Bypass
Motivation: Financial Data Breach, Unauthorized Cash Withdrawals
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Geoswap company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Diebold Nixdorf company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Diebold Nixdorf company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Geoswap company has not reported any.

In the current year, Diebold Nixdorf company and Geoswap company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Diebold Nixdorf company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Geoswap company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Diebold Nixdorf company nor Geoswap company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Diebold Nixdorf company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Geoswap company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Diebold Nixdorf company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Geoswap company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Geoswap nor Diebold Nixdorf holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Geoswap company nor Diebold Nixdorf company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Diebold Nixdorf company employs more people globally than Geoswap company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Geoswap nor Diebold Nixdorf holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Geoswap nor Diebold Nixdorf holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Geoswap nor Diebold Nixdorf holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Geoswap nor Diebold Nixdorf holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Geoswap nor Diebold Nixdorf holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Geoswap nor Diebold Nixdorf holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.