Comparison Overview

Georgia State University

VS

Universidad de Caldas

Georgia State University

33 Gilmer St. SE, Atlanta, GA, 30303, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Georgia State is an urban public research university and national model for student success in Atlanta, the cultural and economic center of the Southeast. The largest university in the state and one of the largest in the nation, Georgia State provides its faculty and more than 51,000 students with unsurpassed access to opportunities in one of America's great global cities. Over a period of 10 years, the university raised graduation rates 22 percentage points and eliminated students achievement gaps based on race, ethnicity or income. Its Atlanta Campus offers more than 250 degree programs in 100 fields of study at the bachelor's, master's, specialist and doctoral levels. Home to more freshmen than any other college or university in Georgia, the university's Perimeter College provides more than 30 associate degree pathways at five campuses throughout metro Atlanta.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 12,338
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Universidad de Caldas

Campus Central Calle 65 Nº 26 - 10 Campus Palogrande Carrera 23 N° 58-65 Manizales, caldas 170003, CO
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Universidad colombiana pública, certificada y reacreditada de alta calidad. Fundada en 1943, hoy cuenta con 70 años de historia y con una oferta de pregrados, especializaciones, maestrías y doctorados desde sus facultades de Ciencias para la Salud; Ciencias Agropecuarias; Artes y Humanidades; Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, Ingenierías y Ciencias Exactas y Naturales.

NAICS: 611
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgiastateuniversity.jpeg
Georgia State University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/universidad-de-caldas.jpeg
Universidad de Caldas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Georgia State University
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Universidad de Caldas
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Georgia State University in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Universidad de Caldas in 2025.

Incident History — Georgia State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Georgia State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Universidad de Caldas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Universidad de Caldas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgiastateuniversity.jpeg
Georgia State University
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/universidad-de-caldas.jpeg
Universidad de Caldas
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Georgia State University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Universidad de Caldas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Universidad de Caldas company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Georgia State University company.

In the current year, Universidad de Caldas company and Georgia State University company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Universidad de Caldas company nor Georgia State University company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Universidad de Caldas company nor Georgia State University company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Universidad de Caldas company nor Georgia State University company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Georgia State University company nor Universidad de Caldas company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Georgia State University nor Universidad de Caldas holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Georgia State University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Universidad de Caldas company.

Georgia State University company employs more people globally than Universidad de Caldas company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Georgia State University nor Universidad de Caldas holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Georgia State University nor Universidad de Caldas holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Georgia State University nor Universidad de Caldas holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Georgia State University nor Universidad de Caldas holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Georgia State University nor Universidad de Caldas holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Georgia State University nor Universidad de Caldas holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H