Comparison Overview

Georgia Powder Coating Inc

VS

Innvotek

Georgia Powder Coating Inc

100 Zander Dr, Gainesville, 30504, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

At Georgia Powder Coating we know that you want to have a product that you are proud of. In order to do that you need a powder coating vendor that you can rely on. The problem is the process often drags to a halt because of poor quality, or missed deadlines leaving you feeling stressed and out of control. We believe life has enough uncertainties, your powder coating partner should not be one of them. We know how frustrating it is to be stuck waiting on an unreliable vendor, which is why we worked hard to earn the #1 spot in the North American Top Shops report. Our proven process is fast, easy and reliable. Here’s how it works. It starts with a quick quote that you can receive in less than 24 hours. We make it easy. We can give you a call or you can give us your information online. After that, we handle all the details. We create a job specification customized to your needs and make sure your final product is one you can be proud of. Finally, you receive your work Done Right, On Time, Every Time and say goodbye to the stress of poor quality and missed deadlines.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Innvotek

undefined, Cambridge, England, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Innvotek is the innovation and technology company based in Cambridge, UK.   Our engineers specialise in automation of inspection, maintenance and digitisation of critical infrastructure in extreme and demanding environments. We develop customised solutions based on our customer requirements in offshore energy, shipping, construction and transport sectors. Our mobile platforms can climb on large assets, operate underwater and are safe in explosive environments.   This allows our customers the opportunity to carry out operations in a safer, more cost-effective manner with greater flexibility.   We also provide technical consultancy in the fields of robotics, automation and data science.   Our team has extensive experience of driving forward collaborative R&D projects. Over more than ten years, we have supported 70+ projects and delivered 30+ technologies and solutions. Our partnership network joins more than 200 organisations across the globe.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgia-powder-coating-inc.jpeg
Georgia Powder Coating Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/innvotek.jpeg
Innvotek
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Georgia Powder Coating Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Innvotek
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Georgia Powder Coating Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Innvotek in 2025.

Incident History — Georgia Powder Coating Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Georgia Powder Coating Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Innvotek (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Innvotek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgia-powder-coating-inc.jpeg
Georgia Powder Coating Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/innvotek.jpeg
Innvotek
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Georgia Powder Coating Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Innvotek company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Innvotek company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Georgia Powder Coating Inc company.

In the current year, Innvotek company and Georgia Powder Coating Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Innvotek company nor Georgia Powder Coating Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Innvotek company nor Georgia Powder Coating Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Innvotek company nor Georgia Powder Coating Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Georgia Powder Coating Inc company nor Innvotek company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Georgia Powder Coating Inc nor Innvotek holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Innvotek company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Georgia Powder Coating Inc company.

Georgia Powder Coating Inc company employs more people globally than Innvotek company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Georgia Powder Coating Inc nor Innvotek holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Georgia Powder Coating Inc nor Innvotek holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Georgia Powder Coating Inc nor Innvotek holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Georgia Powder Coating Inc nor Innvotek holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Georgia Powder Coating Inc nor Innvotek holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Georgia Powder Coating Inc nor Innvotek holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H