Comparison Overview

Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education

VS

Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick

Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education

600 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20001, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Office of Executive and Continuing Legal Education provides high quality educational opportunities for lawyers and law-related professionals to fulfill their life-long learning needs. Georgetown Law has been a leader and innovator in legal education for nearly 150 years. Located in the heart of the nation’s capital, Georgetown Law’s Office of Executive and Continuing Legal Education represents a tradition of excellence. Developed with the profession’s ever-changing needs in mind, we provide the legal community with high quality continuing legal education that meets state bar mandatory CLE requirements. Our programs address the most cutting-edge law and policy issues. Our Executive programs are built upon that strong foundation, expertly tailored to challenge lifelong learners to take their performance to the next level. We offer Executive training participants unparalleled opportunities to expand their skills in substantive areas of law as well as in leadership and management disciplines. Our CLE and Executive Education faculties feature the country’s leading officials, judges, professors, and practitioners.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick

Level 16, Melbourne, Vic, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick is a leading full service intellectual property firm in Australia. With offices in Melbourne, Sydney and Adelaide, the Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick Group incorporates a patent and trade marks attorney firm, an intellectual property law firm and a research and investigation company. The POF Group offers a comprehensive range of legal services to assist clients identify, protect, manage, exploit and enforce their intellectual property assets, including patents, trade marks, designs and copyright. We are one of a small number of Australian businesses whose core focus is intellectual property, and who can provide the full range of legal services associated with IP from conception to enforcement. We offer clients a superior customer focused service that is tailored to meet their individual needs.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 95
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phillips-ormonde-fitzpatrick.jpeg
Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick in 2025.

Incident History — Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgetown-law-oecle.jpeg
Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phillips-ormonde-fitzpatrick.jpeg
Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education company.

In the current year, Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company and Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company nor Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company nor Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company nor Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education company nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education company nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company employs more people globally than Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Georgetown Law Executive & Continuing Legal Education nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X