Comparison Overview

George Smith

VS

The Peak Antler Company

George Smith

587 - 589 Kings Road, London, undefined, SW6 2EH, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

We are a British furniture and fabric company, renowned for being the most experienced makers of exceptional upholstered furniture. We believe in quality and service without compromise, combining precision, craftship and high-quality materials to create beautiful, enduring, comfortable furniture. All the furniture is made at our factory in Newcastle by the largest team of master upholsterers in the UK, using only the best responsibly sourced materials. Our flagship showroom is based on the iconic Kings Road in London (587-589 Kings Road, London, SW6 2EH). We also have showrooms in New York and Los Angeles and we are available through numerous distributors globally.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 92
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Peak Antler Company

279 Pine Bluff Rd, Divide, CO, 80814, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Antler artist Jeff Musgrave has been creating Antler Chandeliers and Antler Furniture for over 27 years. Jeff is well-known for his collaborations with Interior Designers, Architects and homeowners. Jeff’s Peak Antler Company creations can be found in high end residential and hospitality locations across the United States and projects as far off as Europe and Japan. *Custom antler chandeliers and furniture. *Custom finishing options. *Each item is built per order. *We will shipped just about anywhere. * We offer trade prices to Interior Designers and Wholesale accounts Check out our website - https://peakantlers.com/ Wholesale & Designer Trade Sign up - https://peakantlers.com/wholesale-antler-chandeliers-furniture-mirrors-art/

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/george-smith.jpeg
George Smith
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-peak-antler-company.jpeg
The Peak Antler Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
George Smith
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Peak Antler Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for George Smith in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Peak Antler Company in 2025.

Incident History — George Smith (X = Date, Y = Severity)

George Smith cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Peak Antler Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Peak Antler Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/george-smith.jpeg
George Smith
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-peak-antler-company.jpeg
The Peak Antler Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Peak Antler Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to George Smith company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Peak Antler Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to George Smith company.

In the current year, The Peak Antler Company company and George Smith company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Peak Antler Company company nor George Smith company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Peak Antler Company company nor George Smith company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Peak Antler Company company nor George Smith company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither George Smith company nor The Peak Antler Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither George Smith nor The Peak Antler Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither George Smith company nor The Peak Antler Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

George Smith company employs more people globally than The Peak Antler Company company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither George Smith nor The Peak Antler Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither George Smith nor The Peak Antler Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither George Smith nor The Peak Antler Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither George Smith nor The Peak Antler Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither George Smith nor The Peak Antler Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither George Smith nor The Peak Antler Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.