Comparison Overview

George Philanthropy Group

VS

DonorDrive

George Philanthropy Group

Cazenovia, New York, US, 13035
Last Update: 2025-12-18

George Philanthropy Group (GPG), co-founded by principal consultants Phil and Meg George, advises nonprofit organizations, corporations and individuals on high-impact philanthropy. GPG works with nonprofits of all sizes across different sectors on preparing for and carrying out large major gift campaigns. Their services tied to significant fundraising initiatives include feasibility studies and campaign leadership, with a focus on implementing major gift programs. GPG trains leadership to take a relationship-first approach to their work and move prospects in an intentional way. The firm is rooted in the philosophy that the success of all great initiatives is based on a well-considered vision and meaningful relationships. Their work with corporations and individuals & families allows for intentional and meaningful decision-making around philanthropy. Meg and Phil give guidance on mission statements and how to have high-impact with giving that generates real outcomes. George Philanthropy Group is located in Cazenovia, NY and West Palm Beach, FL.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DonorDrive

120 E 8th St, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45202, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

At DonorDrive, we have one mission: to help everyday people become powerful fundraisers for your cause. DonorDrive is designed for enterprise nonprofits to create better fundraising experiences. DonorDrive powers the future of fundraising by providing a better all around experience for nonprofit staff, fundraisers and donors. With over 20 years of innovation, we've helped hundreds of nonprofits grow their events to become leading peer-to-peer fundraising programs.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/george-philanthropy-group.jpeg
George Philanthropy Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/donordrive.jpeg
DonorDrive
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
George Philanthropy Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DonorDrive
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for George Philanthropy Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DonorDrive in 2025.

Incident History — George Philanthropy Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

George Philanthropy Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DonorDrive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DonorDrive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/george-philanthropy-group.jpeg
George Philanthropy Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/donordrive.jpeg
DonorDrive
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both George Philanthropy Group company and DonorDrive company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, DonorDrive company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to George Philanthropy Group company.

In the current year, DonorDrive company and George Philanthropy Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DonorDrive company nor George Philanthropy Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DonorDrive company nor George Philanthropy Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DonorDrive company nor George Philanthropy Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither George Philanthropy Group company nor DonorDrive company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither George Philanthropy Group nor DonorDrive holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither George Philanthropy Group company nor DonorDrive company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DonorDrive company employs more people globally than George Philanthropy Group company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither George Philanthropy Group nor DonorDrive holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither George Philanthropy Group nor DonorDrive holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither George Philanthropy Group nor DonorDrive holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither George Philanthropy Group nor DonorDrive holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither George Philanthropy Group nor DonorDrive holds HIPAA certification.

Neither George Philanthropy Group nor DonorDrive holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N