Comparison Overview

George Mason University

VS

University of Nebraska System

George Mason University

4400 University Drive, Fairfax, Virginia , US, 22030
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

George Mason University is Virginia’s largest and most diverse public research university. Located near Washington, D.C., Mason enrolls more than 40,000 students from 130 countries and 50 states, and has a residential population of more than 6,000 students. Mason has grown rapidly over the past half-century and is recognized for its innovation, entrepreneurship, and commitment to providing academic opportunities for students of all backgrounds. With 10 schools and colleges offering more than 200 degree programs, Mason is a vibrant community of scholars and researchers that spans three campuses in Arlington (Mason Square), Fairfax, and Prince William and learning locations across the Commonwealth of Virginia. We also have an international campus in Songdo, South Korea. Our goal is to enable all of our graduates to pursue meaningful lives and successful careers. Our definition of a successful graduate is a well-rounded scholar and an engaged citizen in the community and the world, who has all the necessary skills to compete in the workplace. More than 75 percent of Mason alumni have a post-graduate plan within six months of graduation (employment, graduate school, military service, or volunteering). In the Washington Business Journal’s 2023 rankings of the Washington, D.C., area’s largest employers, Mason came in 26th overall with more than 8,100 Metro-area employees. If you are interested in joining the Mason Nation take a look at our current opportunities and catch some Mason spirit at jobs.gmu.edu!

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 10,629
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

University of Nebraska System

3835 Holdrege St, None, Lincoln, Nebraska, US, 68583
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

This is the official LinkedIn page of the the University of Nebraska System, the state of Nebraska's only public university. The NU System is comprised of four campuses: the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, the University of Nebraska at Omaha, the University of Nebraska Medical Center, and the University of Nebraska at Kearney. A land-grant flagship campus. An academic medical center. A metropolitan campus serving our urban citizens. And a campus focused on undergraduates. Collectively, these four unique institutions are known as the University of Nebraska System. Each institution has distinct strengths, giving the University of Nebraska System a scope of expertise that is hard to equal. Side by side, we accomplish more—for our state and for our world. Visit us at www.nebraska.edu or follow us on Twitter at @U_Nebraska to learn more. -------------------- COMMUNITY GUIDELINES: When posting to this page, please adhere to the Official University Social Media Community Guidelines, which can be read here: http://bit.ly/NU-community-guidelines

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 22,831
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/george-mason-university.jpeg
George Mason University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-nebraska.jpeg
University of Nebraska System
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
George Mason University
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Nebraska System
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for George Mason University in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Nebraska System in 2025.

Incident History — George Mason University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

George Mason University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Nebraska System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Nebraska System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/george-mason-university.jpeg
George Mason University
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-nebraska.jpeg
University of Nebraska System
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

George Mason University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Nebraska System company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, University of Nebraska System company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to George Mason University company.

In the current year, University of Nebraska System company and George Mason University company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Nebraska System company nor George Mason University company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Nebraska System company nor George Mason University company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Nebraska System company nor George Mason University company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither George Mason University company nor University of Nebraska System company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither George Mason University nor University of Nebraska System holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

George Mason University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Nebraska System company.

University of Nebraska System company employs more people globally than George Mason University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither George Mason University nor University of Nebraska System holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither George Mason University nor University of Nebraska System holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither George Mason University nor University of Nebraska System holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither George Mason University nor University of Nebraska System holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither George Mason University nor University of Nebraska System holds HIPAA certification.

Neither George Mason University nor University of Nebraska System holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H