Comparison Overview

George C. Marshall Foundation

VS

Tennessee Aquarium

George C. Marshall Foundation

340 VMI Parade Ground, Lexington, VA, 24450, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.marshallfoundation.org

George C. Marshall was a man of towering stature whose contributions to our nation and the world cannot be overstated. His characteristics of honesty, integrity, and selfless service stand as shining examples for those who study the past and for those generations to come. The Marshall Foundation is dedicated to celebrating his legacy and inspiring new leaders. The independent Marshall Foundation perpetuates Marshall’s legacy through scholarship, leadership and statesmanship programs and facilities (including a museum and research library) that offer a wide range of resources and materials for use by the general public, amateur historians, scholars and students of all ages.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tennessee Aquarium

1 Broad Street, Chattanooga, 37402, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tnaqua.org

Located on the banks of the Tennessee River in Chattanooga and surrounded by the natural beauty of the mountains, the Tennessee Aquarium tells the story of the river – following the path of a raindrop from the streams of an Appalachian Forest to the Gulf of Mexico – from the mountains to the sea. Although the Aquarium has grown in size and in animal population since it’s opening in 1992, its story and its mission as a private, non-profit institution have remained the same; ‘to inspire wonder, appreciation and protection of water and all life that it sustains.’

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 219
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/george-c-marshall-foundation.jpeg
George C. Marshall Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tennessee-aquarium.jpeg
Tennessee Aquarium
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
George C. Marshall Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tennessee Aquarium
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for George C. Marshall Foundation in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tennessee Aquarium in 2026.

Incident History — George C. Marshall Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

George C. Marshall Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tennessee Aquarium (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tennessee Aquarium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/george-c-marshall-foundation.jpeg
George C. Marshall Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tennessee-aquarium.jpeg
Tennessee Aquarium
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tennessee Aquarium company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to George C. Marshall Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tennessee Aquarium company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to George C. Marshall Foundation company.

In the current year, Tennessee Aquarium company and George C. Marshall Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tennessee Aquarium company nor George C. Marshall Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tennessee Aquarium company nor George C. Marshall Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tennessee Aquarium company nor George C. Marshall Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation company nor Tennessee Aquarium company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor Tennessee Aquarium holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation company nor Tennessee Aquarium company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tennessee Aquarium company employs more people globally than George C. Marshall Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor Tennessee Aquarium holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor Tennessee Aquarium holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor Tennessee Aquarium holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor Tennessee Aquarium holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor Tennessee Aquarium holds HIPAA certification.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor Tennessee Aquarium holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References