Comparison Overview

George C. Marshall Foundation

VS

Clark Art Institute

George C. Marshall Foundation

340 VMI Parade Ground, Lexington, VA, 24450, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

George C. Marshall was a man of towering stature whose contributions to our nation and the world cannot be overstated. His characteristics of honesty, integrity, and selfless service stand as shining examples for those who study the past and for those generations to come. The Marshall Foundation is dedicated to celebrating his legacy and inspiring new leaders. The independent Marshall Foundation perpetuates Marshall’s legacy through scholarship, leadership and statesmanship programs and facilities (including a museum and research library) that offer a wide range of resources and materials for use by the general public, amateur historians, scholars and students of all ages.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Clark Art Institute

225 South Street, Williamstown, Massachusetts, 01267, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The Clark is one of only a handful of institutions globally with a dual mission as an art museum and a distinguished center for research and higher education, dedicated to advancing and extending the public understanding of art. No other institution of its scale and character has such a complex and exhilarating mission—complex because interrelating the differing purposes of an art museum and a center for research and higher education is so challenging, and exhilarating because the possibilities and implications of this combination are so dynamic.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 119
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/george-c-marshall-foundation.jpeg
George C. Marshall Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sterling-and-francine-clark-art-institute.jpeg
Clark Art Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
George C. Marshall Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Clark Art Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for George C. Marshall Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clark Art Institute in 2025.

Incident History — George C. Marshall Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

George C. Marshall Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Clark Art Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clark Art Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/george-c-marshall-foundation.jpeg
George C. Marshall Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sterling-and-francine-clark-art-institute.jpeg
Clark Art Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Clark Art Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to George C. Marshall Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Clark Art Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to George C. Marshall Foundation company.

In the current year, Clark Art Institute company and George C. Marshall Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Clark Art Institute company nor George C. Marshall Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Clark Art Institute company nor George C. Marshall Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Clark Art Institute company nor George C. Marshall Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation company nor Clark Art Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor Clark Art Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation company nor Clark Art Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Clark Art Institute company employs more people globally than George C. Marshall Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor Clark Art Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor Clark Art Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor Clark Art Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor Clark Art Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor Clark Art Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor Clark Art Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X