Comparison Overview

George C. Marshall Foundation

VS

ICA - Art Conservation

George C. Marshall Foundation

340 VMI Parade Ground, Lexington, VA, 24450, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.marshallfoundation.org

George C. Marshall was a man of towering stature whose contributions to our nation and the world cannot be overstated. His characteristics of honesty, integrity, and selfless service stand as shining examples for those who study the past and for those generations to come. The Marshall Foundation is dedicated to celebrating his legacy and inspiring new leaders. The independent Marshall Foundation perpetuates Marshall’s legacy through scholarship, leadership and statesmanship programs and facilities (including a museum and research library) that offer a wide range of resources and materials for use by the general public, amateur historians, scholars and students of all ages.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

ICA - Art Conservation

2937 W 25th St, Cleveland, Ohio, US, 44113
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ica-artconservation.org

ICA-Art Conservation is the oldest full-service art conservation laboratory in the country, and it is the region’s only nonprofit art conservation laboratory serving ALL museums, archives, libraries, and private individuals. It was founded in 1952 by the directors of six American museums, two of whom were monuments men, who understood then, just as we know today the importance of preserving material culture for future generations. Conservation Services Let ICA help you care for your artwork with specialized conservation services, aimed at preserving its beauty for years to come. Preservation Services Protect and maintain the integrity of your invaluable art and cultural artifacts, ensuring their longevity for future generations Education & Engagement Learn about our process up close with lab tours and hands-on workshops. Learn to preserve and protect your own irreplaceable objects with free webinars.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/george-c-marshall-foundation.jpeg
George C. Marshall Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ica-art-conservation.jpeg
ICA - Art Conservation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
George C. Marshall Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ICA - Art Conservation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for George C. Marshall Foundation in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICA - Art Conservation in 2026.

Incident History — George C. Marshall Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

George C. Marshall Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ICA - Art Conservation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICA - Art Conservation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/george-c-marshall-foundation.jpeg
George C. Marshall Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ica-art-conservation.jpeg
ICA - Art Conservation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

George C. Marshall Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ICA - Art Conservation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ICA - Art Conservation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to George C. Marshall Foundation company.

In the current year, ICA - Art Conservation company and George C. Marshall Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ICA - Art Conservation company nor George C. Marshall Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ICA - Art Conservation company nor George C. Marshall Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ICA - Art Conservation company nor George C. Marshall Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation company nor ICA - Art Conservation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor ICA - Art Conservation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation company nor ICA - Art Conservation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

George C. Marshall Foundation company employs more people globally than ICA - Art Conservation company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor ICA - Art Conservation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor ICA - Art Conservation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor ICA - Art Conservation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor ICA - Art Conservation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor ICA - Art Conservation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation nor ICA - Art Conservation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References