Comparison Overview

Geonexus

VS

Alibaba Group

Geonexus

3005 Boardwalk Street, Ann Arbor, 48108, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.geo-nexus.com

Geonexus empowers asset-intensive organizations, including Utilities, Transportation, and Government, with a no-code integration platform that seamlessly connects enterprise systems like Esri, IBM Maximo, SAP, Oracle, Hexagon, and more. Our solution enhances data availability, accuracy, and timeliness, driving efficiency, reducing costs, and accelerating digital transformation.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Alibaba Group

969 West Wen Yi Road, Hangzhou, 311121, CN
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849
http://www.alibabagroup.com

🌍Alibaba Group is on a mission to make it easy to do business anywhere! Guided by our passion and imagination, we’re leading the way in AI, cloud computing and e-commerce. We aim to build the future infrastructure of commerce, and we aspire to be a good company that lasts for 102 years.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 84,233
Subsidiaries: 35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geonexus-technologies.jpeg
Geonexus
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chinese-alibaba-group.jpeg
Alibaba Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Geonexus
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alibaba Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Geonexus in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alibaba Group in 2026.

Incident History — Geonexus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Geonexus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alibaba Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alibaba Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geonexus-technologies.jpeg
Geonexus
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chinese-alibaba-group.jpeg
Alibaba Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: AI System Autonomy
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Brute-force attacks, Exploiting unpatched vulnerabilities, Weak configurations
Motivation: Financial gain, Disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Stolen credentials, Exploited enterprise services (e.g., Java serialization flaws)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Alibaba Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Geonexus company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Alibaba Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Geonexus company has not reported any.

In the current year, Alibaba Group company has reported more cyber incidents than Geonexus company.

Neither Alibaba Group company nor Geonexus company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Alibaba Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Geonexus company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Alibaba Group company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Geonexus company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Geonexus company nor Alibaba Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Geonexus nor Alibaba Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Alibaba Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Geonexus company.

Alibaba Group company employs more people globally than Geonexus company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Geonexus nor Alibaba Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Geonexus nor Alibaba Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Geonexus nor Alibaba Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Geonexus nor Alibaba Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Geonexus nor Alibaba Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Geonexus nor Alibaba Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References