Comparison Overview

Genting Singapore Limited

VS

Ovations Food Services, LP

Genting Singapore Limited

10 Sentosa Gateway, Resorts World Sentosa, , None, Singapore, Singapore, SG, 098270
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Genting Singapore Limited (GENS) is a brand leader in sustainable integrated resort (IR) development and management. Our mission is to develop world-class integrated resorts that transform destinations, create jobs, and reinvest in local economies through sustainability-conscious practices. Incorporated in 1984 and listed on the Singapore Stock Exchange, GENS has over 30 years of global destination building experience. We are recognized as trailblazers in IR development, launching Singapore’s first IR, Resorts World Sentosa (RWS). The award-winning RWS features world-class attractions, luxury hotels, MICE facilities, entertainment and lifestyle offerings, and a casino, providing a unique blend of business, lifestyle, entertainment, and educational experiences. GENS is a constituent of the Straits Times Index, MSCI Singapore Free Index, Nikkei Asia300 Investable Index, SGX ESG Leaders Index, FSTE4Good Asean 5 Index, FTSE4Good Developed Index, and Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 80
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ovations Food Services, LP

3601 S Broad St Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Ovations Food Services is now Spectra. Spectra is an industry leader in hosting and entertainment, partnering with clients to create memorable experiences for millions of visitors every year. Spectra’s unmatched blend of integrated services delivers incremental value for clients through several primary areas of expertise: Venue Management, Food Services & Hospitality, and Partnerships. Spectra's Food Services & Hospitality division delivers the industry’s most innovative and profitable solutions through its Everything Fresh™ philosophy at sports arenas, stadiums, casinos, convention centers, cultural attractions, fairgrounds, and other specialty venues. Spectra Food Services & Hospitality serves over 250,000 events and 40 million guests each year. Learn more at SpectraExperiences.com.

NAICS: 721
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gentingsingaporelimited.jpeg
Genting Singapore Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ovations-food-services-lp.jpeg
Ovations Food Services, LP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Genting Singapore Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ovations Food Services, LP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Genting Singapore Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ovations Food Services, LP in 2025.

Incident History — Genting Singapore Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Genting Singapore Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ovations Food Services, LP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ovations Food Services, LP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gentingsingaporelimited.jpeg
Genting Singapore Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ovations-food-services-lp.jpeg
Ovations Food Services, LP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Genting Singapore Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ovations Food Services, LP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ovations Food Services, LP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Genting Singapore Limited company.

In the current year, Ovations Food Services, LP company and Genting Singapore Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ovations Food Services, LP company nor Genting Singapore Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ovations Food Services, LP company nor Genting Singapore Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ovations Food Services, LP company nor Genting Singapore Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Genting Singapore Limited company nor Ovations Food Services, LP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Genting Singapore Limited nor Ovations Food Services, LP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Genting Singapore Limited company nor Ovations Food Services, LP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ovations Food Services, LP company employs more people globally than Genting Singapore Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither Genting Singapore Limited nor Ovations Food Services, LP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Genting Singapore Limited nor Ovations Food Services, LP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Genting Singapore Limited nor Ovations Food Services, LP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Genting Singapore Limited nor Ovations Food Services, LP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Genting Singapore Limited nor Ovations Food Services, LP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Genting Singapore Limited nor Ovations Food Services, LP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H