Comparison Overview

Genpact

VS

EY-Parthenon

Genpact

1155, New York, NY, 10036, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Genpact (NYSE: G) is a global professional services and solutions firm delivering outcomes that shape the future. Our 125,000+ people across 30+ countries are driven by our innate curiosity, entrepreneurial agility, and desire to create lasting value for clients. Powered by our purpose – the relentless pursuit of a world that works better for people – we serve and transform leading enterprises, including the Fortune Global 500, with our deep business and industry knowledge, digital operations services, and expertise in data, technology, and AI. Get to know us at genpact.com and on LinkedIn, X, YouTube, and Facebook. Get to know us at www.genpact.com and on the following social handles: X: https://twitter.com/genpact Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ProudToBeGenpact/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/genpact_global/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@GenpactGlobal ** Beware of fake offers** Genpact never requires applicants to pay to be part of our hiring process. If you receive an email asking you to purchase a starter kit, equipment, or training, or to pay to apply for a role, you can assume that the message is a scam. For more information on careers at Genpact, please visit us at https://www.genpact.com/careers

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 132,959
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

EY-Parthenon

1 More London Place, London, United Kingdom, GB, SE1 2AF
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Our unique combination of transformative strategy, transactions and corporate finance delivers real-world value – solutions that work in practice, not just on paper. Benefiting from EY’s full spectrum of services, we’ve reimagined strategic consulting to work in a world of increasing complexity. With deep functional and sector expertise, paired with innovative AI-powered technology and an investor mindset, we partner with CEOs, boards, private equity and governments every step of the way – enabling you to shape your future with confidence. EY-Parthenon is a brand under which a number of EY member firms across the globe provide strategy consulting services. For more information, please visit ey.com/parthenon.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 15,690
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genpact.jpeg
Genpact
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ey-parthenon.jpeg
EY-Parthenon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Genpact
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EY-Parthenon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Genpact in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EY-Parthenon in 2025.

Incident History — Genpact (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Genpact cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EY-Parthenon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EY-Parthenon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genpact.jpeg
Genpact
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ey-parthenon.jpeg
EY-Parthenon
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: publicly accessible unprotected database backup (.BAK file)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: cloud bucket misconfiguration (publicly accessible storage)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party service vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

EY-Parthenon company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Genpact company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

EY-Parthenon company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Genpact company has not reported any.

In the current year, EY-Parthenon company has reported more cyber incidents than Genpact company.

Neither EY-Parthenon company nor Genpact company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

EY-Parthenon company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Genpact company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither EY-Parthenon company nor Genpact company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Genpact company nor EY-Parthenon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Genpact nor EY-Parthenon holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

EY-Parthenon company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Genpact company.

Genpact company employs more people globally than EY-Parthenon company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Neither Genpact nor EY-Parthenon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Genpact nor EY-Parthenon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Genpact nor EY-Parthenon holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Genpact nor EY-Parthenon holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Genpact nor EY-Parthenon holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Genpact nor EY-Parthenon holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H