Comparison Overview

Genesis Project 1, Inc.

VS

AT Family Therapy

Genesis Project 1, Inc.

5104 Reagan Dr, Charlotte, 28206, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.genesisproject1.com/

Genesis Project 1, Inc. is committed to the development of programs that address the factors that perpetuate poverty, addiction, oppression, and abuse. We are committed to the development of programs that eradicate the factors that perpetuate poverty, homelessness, hatred, and abuse. We are comprised of a diverse group of mental health professionals, experienced social workers, and community advocates serving the Mecklenburg and Gaston county communities. Our services are provided in homes, schools, correctional facilities, homeless shelters, street locations, etc. Our services are designed to provide a professional and confidential setting for the psychological, emotional, and developmental support of families as they pursue collective and individual goals and explore personal growth, and act as a resource for communities and schools to assist with their interactions with struggling families. If you are interested in learning more about out company or applying for a position with us, please visit our website.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

AT Family Therapy

None
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.atfamilytherapy.com

AT Family Therapy provides counseling services for the whole family. Services include: Marital and pre-marital counseling Relationship Counseling Family counseling Individual Counseling Child and Adolescent Counseling AT Family Therapy also offers Becoming a Love and Logic Parent classes to help parents learn skills and strategies to avoid power struggles with their children and learn how to foster loving, healthy relationships.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genesis-project-1-inc..jpeg
Genesis Project 1, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
AT Family Therapy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Genesis Project 1, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AT Family Therapy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Genesis Project 1, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AT Family Therapy in 2026.

Incident History — Genesis Project 1, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Genesis Project 1, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AT Family Therapy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AT Family Therapy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genesis-project-1-inc..jpeg
Genesis Project 1, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
AT Family Therapy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AT Family Therapy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Genesis Project 1, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, AT Family Therapy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Genesis Project 1, Inc. company.

In the current year, AT Family Therapy company and Genesis Project 1, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AT Family Therapy company nor Genesis Project 1, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AT Family Therapy company nor Genesis Project 1, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AT Family Therapy company nor Genesis Project 1, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Genesis Project 1, Inc. company nor AT Family Therapy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Genesis Project 1, Inc. nor AT Family Therapy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Genesis Project 1, Inc. company nor AT Family Therapy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Genesis Project 1, Inc. company employs more people globally than AT Family Therapy company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Genesis Project 1, Inc. nor AT Family Therapy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Genesis Project 1, Inc. nor AT Family Therapy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Genesis Project 1, Inc. nor AT Family Therapy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Genesis Project 1, Inc. nor AT Family Therapy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Genesis Project 1, Inc. nor AT Family Therapy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Genesis Project 1, Inc. nor AT Family Therapy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References