Comparison Overview

Genesee Photo Systems Inc

VS

Philip Thomae Photographer

Genesee Photo Systems Inc

1015 W 4th Ave, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074-3310, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.geneseephoto.com/

Genesee Photo Systems / Party Pix was established with a very simple purpose: to provide quality products and services at competitive prices. This commitment to excellence has served us well over the last 30 years. It has driven us to expand our operation in effort to provide our customers with the most current technology without sacrificing the personal touch that people have grown to expect. Our in house lab allows us to offer quality service and lower prices without lowering our standards. Our business is diverse, encompassing almost any event, from graduations, portraits, sports, and proms to name a few. In an ongoing effort to exceed our clients expectations, our on site lab offers the opportunity for same day service with quality we can control.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Philip Thomae Photographer

undefined, undefined, undefined, 77979, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
http://www.philipthomae.com

Philip Thomae is the driving force at Philip Thomae Photographer. He gets the jobs, is the creative genius behind all work and executes the work assignment. He does the billing and the bookkeepping as well. He works 7 days a week and will accept assignments 24 hours per day. He works well with people of all ages and backgrounds. A truly gifted and astounding individual to say the least about Philip Thomae Photographer in Port Lavaca, Texas. Check out the Port Lavaca Chamber of Commerce for a personal recommendation and samples of work that he has done for them.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genesee-photo-systems-inc.jpeg
Genesee Photo Systems Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philip-thomae-photographer.jpeg
Philip Thomae Photographer
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Genesee Photo Systems Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Philip Thomae Photographer
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Genesee Photo Systems Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Philip Thomae Photographer in 2025.

Incident History — Genesee Photo Systems Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Genesee Photo Systems Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Philip Thomae Photographer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Philip Thomae Photographer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genesee-photo-systems-inc.jpeg
Genesee Photo Systems Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philip-thomae-photographer.jpeg
Philip Thomae Photographer
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Genesee Photo Systems Inc company and Philip Thomae Photographer company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Philip Thomae Photographer company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Genesee Photo Systems Inc company.

In the current year, Philip Thomae Photographer company and Genesee Photo Systems Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Philip Thomae Photographer company nor Genesee Photo Systems Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Philip Thomae Photographer company nor Genesee Photo Systems Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Philip Thomae Photographer company nor Genesee Photo Systems Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Genesee Photo Systems Inc company nor Philip Thomae Photographer company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Genesee Photo Systems Inc nor Philip Thomae Photographer holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Genesee Photo Systems Inc company nor Philip Thomae Photographer company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Philip Thomae Photographer company employs more people globally than Genesee Photo Systems Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Genesee Photo Systems Inc nor Philip Thomae Photographer holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Genesee Photo Systems Inc nor Philip Thomae Photographer holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Genesee Photo Systems Inc nor Philip Thomae Photographer holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Genesee Photo Systems Inc nor Philip Thomae Photographer holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Genesee Photo Systems Inc nor Philip Thomae Photographer holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Genesee Photo Systems Inc nor Philip Thomae Photographer holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References