Comparison Overview

Genesee Health System

VS

Arcadia Recovery Center

Genesee Health System

1040 W Bristol Rd, Flint, 48507, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Genesee Health System (formerly Genesee County Community Mental Health) is supported by 500+ employees and is located in the heart of Flint, Michigan. GHS positions span a broad range of careers, from entry-level to professional, clinical, medical, finance, information systems, and human resources. GHS is on the forefront of shaping healthcare and offers rewarding opportunities for individuals who are interested making a difference in a community challenged by those afflicted with poverty, social injustices, and violence. Our Mission: We are dedicated to providing the highest quality, most effective services and supports available to meet the mental health, developmental disability, and substance use disorder needs of the adults, children, and families we serve in Genesee County. These services will be provided in a welcoming, supportive way that is helpful to symptom stabilization, long-term recovery, and achievement of the varied life goals envisioned by the people in our care. *This page is not monitored 24/7. For general information, contact us at 810.257.3705, Monday–Friday from 8-5. For a mental health crisis, contact us 24/7 at 810.257.3740 or 877.346.3648, or you can text FLINT to 741741 to be connected with a live trained Crisis Counselor. We’re here to help!

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 381
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Arcadia Recovery Center

806 S 1040 W, Payson, 84651, US
Last Update: 2025-12-25

Arcadia Recovery Center is a drug and alcohol rehab facility located in Utah County in the city of Payson. Arcadia was founded on the principle of hope that exists for every addict and alcoholic actively engaged in their addiction. No one person is broken or lost to their disease. There is always hope for all who have the honesty, open-mindedness and willingness to recover. We are a multi-systemic facility utilizing every facet of treatment modality and spiritual principle available today. We hold evidence based treatment in the highest regard operating with the most up to date and effective treatment practices available.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genesee-health-system.jpeg
Genesee Health System
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arcadia-recovery-center.jpeg
Arcadia Recovery Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Genesee Health System
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arcadia Recovery Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Genesee Health System in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arcadia Recovery Center in 2026.

Incident History — Genesee Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Genesee Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arcadia Recovery Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arcadia Recovery Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genesee-health-system.jpeg
Genesee Health System
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arcadia-recovery-center.jpeg
Arcadia Recovery Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Genesee Health System company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Arcadia Recovery Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Arcadia Recovery Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Genesee Health System company.

In the current year, Arcadia Recovery Center company and Genesee Health System company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arcadia Recovery Center company nor Genesee Health System company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Arcadia Recovery Center company nor Genesee Health System company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Arcadia Recovery Center company nor Genesee Health System company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Genesee Health System company nor Arcadia Recovery Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Genesee Health System nor Arcadia Recovery Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Genesee Health System company nor Arcadia Recovery Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Genesee Health System company employs more people globally than Arcadia Recovery Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Genesee Health System nor Arcadia Recovery Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Genesee Health System nor Arcadia Recovery Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Genesee Health System nor Arcadia Recovery Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Genesee Health System nor Arcadia Recovery Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Genesee Health System nor Arcadia Recovery Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Genesee Health System nor Arcadia Recovery Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N