Comparison Overview

Genesee District Library

VS

Marathon County Public Library

Genesee District Library

4195 W. Pasadena Ave, Flint, 48504, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Genesee District Library (GDL) is an award-winning system of 19 locations and the Talking Book Center Library for the Blind and Physically Handicapped. All library buildings (excluding Genesee Valley Center location) are owned by the local governmental agencies. The GDL provides staffing, materials, administrative support, technology, and programming. Over 1 million visits are made annually to the GDL for its large traditional and online collection, reference resources, high-speed access to the Internet,Wi-Fi, special services, seminars, and family programming. The GDL is funded by a .7481 county-wide millage (excluding City of Flint). An additional 0.25 mills was approved on May 3, 2011. The remaining revenue comes from other sources, such as fees and fines, state aid, penal fines, sponsorships, grants and gifts.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Marathon County Public Library

300 North First Street, Wausau, Wisconsin, US, 54403
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Marathon County Public Library (MCPL) provides free library services to the residents of central Wisconsin. MCPL consists of nine locations throughout Marathon County, Wisconsin, including its Wausau Headquarters, plus branches in Athens, Edgar, Hatley, Marathon City, Mosinee, Rothschild, Spencer and Stratford. MCPL is a member of the Wisconsin Valley Library Service.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genesee-district-library.jpeg
Genesee District Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marathon-county-public-library.jpeg
Marathon County Public Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Genesee District Library
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Marathon County Public Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Genesee District Library in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marathon County Public Library in 2025.

Incident History — Genesee District Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Genesee District Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Marathon County Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marathon County Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genesee-district-library.jpeg
Genesee District Library
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marathon-county-public-library.jpeg
Marathon County Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Genesee District Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Marathon County Public Library company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Marathon County Public Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Genesee District Library company.

In the current year, Marathon County Public Library company and Genesee District Library company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Marathon County Public Library company nor Genesee District Library company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Marathon County Public Library company nor Genesee District Library company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Marathon County Public Library company nor Genesee District Library company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Genesee District Library company nor Marathon County Public Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Genesee District Library nor Marathon County Public Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Genesee District Library company nor Marathon County Public Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Genesee District Library company employs more people globally than Marathon County Public Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Genesee District Library nor Marathon County Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Genesee District Library nor Marathon County Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Genesee District Library nor Marathon County Public Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Genesee District Library nor Marathon County Public Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Genesee District Library nor Marathon County Public Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Genesee District Library nor Marathon County Public Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H